As maintainers of the gem, this is our guide. Most of the steps and guidelines in the Contributing document apply here, including how to set up your environment, write code to fit the code style, run tests, craft commits and manage branches. Beyond this, this document provides some details that would be too low-level for contributors.
- Communication
- Managing the community
- Workflow
- Issuing a new release
- Architecture
- Running tests
- Updating the changelog
- Documentation
- Versioning
- Updating the landing page
- Labels in GitHub
We have several ways that we can communicate with each other:
- In planning major releases, it can be helpful to create a new issue outlining the changes as well as steps needed to launch the release. This serves both as an announcement to the community as well as an area to keep a checklist.
- To track progress for the next release, GitHub milestones are useful.
- To track progress on the movement of issues, labels are useful.
- To communicate small-scale changes, pull requests are effective, as mentioned above.
- To communicate large-scale changes or explain topics, email is best.
As anyone who has played a sim game before knows, it's important to make your patrons happy. We do this by:
- Answering questions from members of the community
- Closing stale issues and feature requests
- Keeping the community informed by ensuring that the changelog is up to date
- Ensuring that the inline documentation, as well as the docsite, is kept up to date
We generally follow GitHub Flow. The main
branch is the main line, and all
branches are cut from and get merged back into this branch. Generally, the
workflow is as follows:
- Cut a feature or bugfix branch from this branch.
- Upon completing a branch, create a PR and ask another maintainer to approve it.
- Try to keep the commit history as clean as possible. Before merging, squash "WIP" or related commits together and rebase as needed.
- Once your PR is approved and you've cleaned up your branch, you're free to merge it in.
Besides the matchers, which are covered in
Contributing, there are files in lib
which you may
need to reference or update:
lib/shoulda/matchers/doublespeak*
— a small handrolled mocking library which is used by thepermit
matcherlib/shoulda/matchers/util*
— extra methods which are used in various places to detect library versions, wrap/indent text, and more
The Contributing guide shows how to use Appraisal to run tests. This works well if you are hopping in, making a few changes, and hopping right out, but if you plan on working on a feature or bug, there is often a faster alternative, at least for unit tests: Zeus. Zeus works by preloading the Rails environment so that running unit tests are a lot faster. We also have it set up to automatically select the latest Appraisal so you don't have to provide that.
You'll want to start by running zeus start
in one shell. Then in another
shell, instead of using bundle exec rspec
to run tests, you'll use bundle exec zeus rspec
. So for instance, you might say:
bundle exec zeus rspec spec/unit/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_inclusion_of_matcher_spec.rb
This is long to say, but it helps if you add an alias to your shell:
alias zr="bundle exec zeus rspec"
Every so often you may need to issue a new release. Here are the steps that we follow to accomplish this:
-
First, make sure you have access to publish new gems to RubyGems.
-
Next, you'll want to decide which version number you're about to release. In most cases, you are deciding between a patch release and a minor release, and you can ask whether a new feature is being added that didn't exist before to determine which one it should be.
-
Next, you'll want to make sure that the changelog is up to date and has a section at the top for the new version with all its changes and references to the appropriate pull requests or commits.
-
Next, generate the documentation locally and do a quick spot-check (pull up the Classes and Methods menus, click around a bit) to ensure that nothing looks awry.
-
Next, update the
VERSION
constant inlib/shoulda/matchers/version.rb
. This constant is referenced in the gemspec and is used in the Rake tasks to publish the gem on RubyGems as well as generate documentation. -
Assuming that everything looks good, place your changes to the changelog,
version.rb
, and README in their own commit titled "Bump version to X.Y.Z". Push this to GitHub (you can use[ci skip]
) in the body of the commit message to skip CI for this commit if you so choose). There is no going back after this point! -
Once GitHub has the version-change commit, you will run:
rake release
This will not only push the gem to RubyGems, but also publish the docs to GitHub Pages.
-
Finally, you'll want to make sure that GitHub's Releases section reflects the latest version. Copy the newest section in the changelog, draft a new Release, paste what you copied from the changelog as the description, then publish that release.
That's it!
After every user-facing change makes it into main, we make a note of it in the
changelog, kept in CHANGELOG.md
. The changelog is sorted in reverse order by
release version, with the topmost version as the next release (tagged as
"(Unreleased)").
Within each version, there are five available categories you can divide changes into. They are all optional but they should appear in this order:
- Backward-compatible changes
- Deprecations
- Bug fixes
- Features
- Improvements
Within each category section, the changes relevant to that category are listed in chronological order.
For each change, provide a human-readable description of the change as well as a linked reference to the PR where that change emerged (or the commit ID if no such PR is available). This helps users cross-reference changes if they need to.
As mentioned in the Contributing document, we use YARD for
documentation. YARD is configured via .yardopts
to process the Ruby files in
lib/
as well as CHANGELOG.md
and the Markdown files in docs/
and write the
documentation in HTML form to doc
. This command will generate said
documentation:
bundle exec yard doc
This works, but if you're actively updating the documentation, it's more helpful to launch a process that will watch the aforementioned source files for changes and generate the HTML for you automatically:
bundle exec rake docs:autogenerate
Whichever approach you take, you can view the generated docs locally by running:
open doc/index.html
The Ruby documentation is hosted on GitHub Pages on a custom domain*:
https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs
This URL actually links to a HTML page which merely serves to automatically redirect the visitor to the docs for the latest published version of the gem. This version is hardcoded in the HTML page.
Generally you will update the published docs as a part of a release, but there may be situations where you'll need to do it manually.
You can re-publish the docs for the latest version (as governed by
lib/shoulda/matchers/version.rb
) by running:
bundle exec rake docs:publish_latest
This will update the auto-redirect on the index page to the latest version. For instance, if the latest version were 4.0.0, this command would publish the docs at https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs/v4.0.0 and simultaneously redirect https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs to this location.
However, if you want to publish the docs for a version but manually set the auto-redirected version, you can run this instead:
bundle exec rake docs:publish[version, latest_version]
Here, version
and latest_version
are both version strings. For instance, you
might say:
bundle exec rake docs:publish[4.0.0, 3.7.2]
This would publish the docs for 4.0.0 at https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs/v4.0.0, but redirect https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs to https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs/v3.7.2.
* thoughtbot owns https://shoulda.io, and
they've got matchers.shoulda.io
set up on the DNS level as an alias for
thoughtbot.github.io/shoulda-matchers
.
The version for the gem is stored in
lib/shoulda/matchers/version.rb
. This contains a constant which
is referenced by shoulda-matchers.gemspec
.
How do we change the version number over time? As designated in the README, we follow SemVer 2.0. This offers a meaningful baseline for deciding how to name versions. Generally speaking:
- We bump the "major" part of the version if we're introducing backward-incompatible changes (e.g. changing the API or core behavior, removing parts of the API, or dropping support for a version of Ruby).
- We bump the "minor" part if we're adding a new feature (e.g. adding a new matcher or adding a new qualifier to a matcher).
- We bump the "patch" part if we're merely including bugfixes.
In addition to major, minor, and patch levels, you can also append a
suffix to the version for pre-release versions. We usually use this to issue
release candidates prior to an actual release. A version number in this case
might look like 4.0.0.rc1
.
In order to publish a new version of the gem to RubyGems, you will need to have been added as an owner. If you want to give someone else these permissions, then run:
gem owner shoulda-matchers -a <email address>
The Shoulda Matchers landing page is located at:
The code for this page is stored on the site
branch. There are
instructions there for maintaining and publishing it.
Considering that we work on the gem in our spare time, we've found labels to be useful for cataloguing and marking progress. Over time we've added quite a collection of labels. Here's a quick list:
- Issue: Bug
- Issue: Feature Request
- Issue: Need to Investigate — if we don't know whether a bug is legitimate or not
- Issue: PR Needed — perhaps unnecessary, but it does signal to the community that we'd love a PR
- PR: Bugfix
- PR: Feature
- PR: Good to Merge — most of the time not necessary, but can be helpful in a code freeze before a release to mark PRs that we will include in the next release
- PR: In Progress — used to mark PRs that are still being worked on by the PR author
- PR: Needs Documentation
- PR: Needs Review
- PR: Needs Tests
- PR: Needs Updates Before Merge — along the same lines as the other "Needs" tags, but more generic
- Blocked
- Documentation
- Needs Decision
- Needs Revisiting
- Question
- Rails X
- Ruby X.Y
- UX