Replies: 3 comments
-
Hmm, I wouldn't be opposed to this idea. However, I'd like to try it myself with the extension and see if there's perhaps an alternative to forking the package. If we do end up choosing to fork the package, we should keep in mind to make it as easy to possible to receive upstream changes in the cases where there's an update!
I haven't played around with it yet but I wonder if we can achieve these features by using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Please do! I would be glad to be wrong, as I know maintaining another fork would be extra work. Keep in mind that the extensions themselves are not the problem. They're very powerful and let you basically write your own parser to detect a sequence and replace it with a different output. I was able to write an extension for spoilers which outputs perfect HTML. When I saved that HTML to a file and opened in the browser, it worked perfectly. The problem is actually in the HTML renderer. I'm assuming we'd want to use the
That looks very promising!! Thanks for the good discussion! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks to your research, I think we have determined that we do not need to fork flutter_markdown. For spoilers, see #867. For link improvements, see #869. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would like to discuss the possibility of eventually forking flutter_markdown. I believe this might be necessary to achieve a few of the features that we want and that have been requested. Here are the ones I'm thinking of, and there may be more.
details
), then it won't render properly. Support for that tag will need to be added upstream.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions