-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can I use local cache only? #61
Comments
This is certainly doable. However how do you see this working with the remote cache?
|
@muukii If you need to use the feature "right now" as a work-around you can just provide fake AWS credentials and a fake name for the S3-Bucket. Then use the normal upload/download commands. Rome will fail uploading to the network but should copy to/from your local cache. |
@blender I think that Rome should have |
I would love to see this feature, I'm willing to help implement it, I just need some initial guidance. |
@muukii @caynan I'm at work on it but it's requiring some major code refactoring to avoid a ton of duplication. The idea i'm going for is that in your RomeFile you can specify ONLY a "local" key, at which point rome will only do things locally. If you specify only @caynan Thank for the availability, you can follow the progress here: #63 |
@muukii @caynan please try pre-release https://github.com/blender/Rome/releases/tag/v0.11.0.25 in your Romefile you can just specify |
@blender I will try it in a bit, you're the best. I'm sorry I couldn't help you, I realized the code base is in Haskell and I don't have any knowledge of it :/ |
@caynan Thanks, I am glad of your appreciation. I encourage you to try your hand at Haskell :) Let me know if you encounter any bugs with this version. |
@blender whoa! Thank you! I'll try it! |
I want to use Rome as local cache only.
That is useful when I using git-worktree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: