You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The targeted patch "fooling event" metric, described in the APRICOT arxiv, describes how successful a patch is in causing a detector to predict a targeted class at the location of the patch.
For ex: say a patch targets class A. When computing targeted mAP, we treat the patch as an object of class A. So if the detector predicts class A at the patch's location, that's considered a true positive. Thus, higher mAP implies the patches were more successful in achieving their goal (and lower mAP implies a more robust model/defense).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The targeted patch "fooling event" metric, described in the APRICOT arxiv, describes how successful a patch is in causing a detector to predict a targeted class at the location of the patch.
For ex: say a patch targets class A. When computing targeted mAP, we treat the patch as an object of class A. So if the detector predicts class A at the patch's location, that's considered a true positive. Thus, higher mAP implies the patches were more successful in achieving their goal (and lower mAP implies a more robust model/defense).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: