You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue was noted and fixed by @christinaholtNOAA (and others) in their branch (see commit 11f31c53 in the NCAR fork) by correcting the data in qc_check, but I will instead adjust the input data just after read. This change will be tested with a simple unit test to check that values greater than the max allowed value (0.5) are properly replaced by 0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@LarissaReames-NOAA What exactly is the problem with the grib2 data? Does the land mask not match the data? I suggest we make a list (and some graphics) of all the problems with the grib2 data so it can be fixed.
@GeorgeGayno-NOAA I believe this is tied to the same issue as the erroneous soil temperature problems that I addressed in my last PR, so it's already in the pipe at NCO to be fixed. However, we'll still need this in place for compatibility with current and older files.
This issue was noted and fixed by @christinaholtNOAA (and others) in their branch (see commit 11f31c53 in the NCAR fork) by correcting the data in qc_check, but I will instead adjust the input data just after read. This change will be tested with a simple unit test to check that values greater than the max allowed value (0.5) are properly replaced by 0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: