Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(serverAssets): support ignore option #2302

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024
Merged

feat(serverAssets): support ignore option #2302

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

jsonleex
Copy link
Contributor

@jsonleex jsonleex commented Mar 23, 2024

πŸ”— Linked issue

#2301

❓ Type of change

  • πŸ“– Documentation (updates to the documentation, readme, or JSdoc annotations)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@jsonleex jsonleex changed the title wip: ignore option for serverAssets feat: ignore option for serverAssets Mar 26, 2024
@jsonleex jsonleex marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2024 06:25
@pi0 pi0 changed the title feat: ignore option for serverAssets feat(serverAssets): ignore option Apr 3, 2024
@pi0 pi0 changed the title feat(serverAssets): ignore option feat(serverAssets): support ignore option Apr 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@pi0 pi0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@pi0 pi0 merged commit 2d6381d into nitrojs:main Apr 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@pi0 pi0 mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants