Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(routing): add nested example #2625

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024
Merged

docs(routing): add nested example #2625

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

geromegrignon
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ”— Linked issue

#2415

❓ Type of change

  • πŸ“– Documentation (updates to the documentation, readme, or JSdoc annotations)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

Nesting routes with file based routing and using index files might be missing from an user's perspective.
Id adds a more complete example of a structure.

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@geromegrignon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Partially unrelated, i'm unsure about this note:
image

Does it mean the folder structure for standalone nitro is /api and /routes, while prefixed by serverfor Nuxt apps?
Because by creating a standalone nitro app nowadays, there is a root server folder too.

@atinux
Copy link
Collaborator

atinux commented Jul 22, 2024

Does it mean the folder structure for standalone nitro is /api and /routes, while prefixed by serverfor Nuxt apps?
Because by creating a standalone nitro app nowadays, there is a root server folder too.

Nice catch, I think we can now remove this alert in the docs.

Copy link
Member

@pi0 pi0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@pi0 pi0 merged commit 79c58b9 into nitrojs:v2 Jul 22, 2024
@pi0 pi0 mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants