Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: remove add/remove event listener polyfills #1417

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 27, 2023

Conversation

Thomaash
Copy link
Member

These are polyfills for very old browsers. We don't polyfill these browsers using core-js (i.e. it most likely doesn't work in them anyway) and barely anyone is using them nowadays.

…owsers using core-js (i.e. it most likely doesn't work anyway) and barely anyone is using them nowadays.
@Thomaash Thomaash requested a review from a team October 21, 2023 20:54
mojoaxel
mojoaxel previously approved these changes Oct 25, 2023
Copy link
Member

@mojoaxel mojoaxel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not a big fan of doing big syntax changes mixed in with other changes but I don't mind.

@Thomaash
Copy link
Member Author

I'm not a big fan of doing big syntax changes mixed in with other changes but I don't mind.

Me neither, that was a mistake, I undid that.

@Thomaash Thomaash merged commit 8e77607 into master Oct 27, 2023
@Thomaash Thomaash deleted the remove-add-remove-event-listener-polyfills branch October 27, 2023 17:48
@vis-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

vis-bot commented Nov 4, 2023

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.6 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@robaho
Copy link

robaho commented Feb 21, 2024

This broke vis-graph3d. You should not make api changes in minor releases.

@mojoaxel
Copy link
Member

@robaho Sorry for that!

@Thomaash Could you please have a look!?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants