Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

workflows: Update to latest actions/setup-go #13023

Merged

Conversation

dbussink
Copy link
Contributor

@dbussink dbussink commented May 4, 2023

We were using v3 and v2 in places. v2 throws a deprecation warning for node.js. So let's update this in general across the board to the latest released version.

Marked this for backporting to v15 and v16 as well since https://github.blog/changelog/2022-09-22-github-actions-all-actions-will-begin-running-on-node16-instead-of-node12/ talks about summer 2023 and rather not get hit then with something breaking if we need to release a patch for still supported versions.

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on the CI
  • Documentation was added or is not required

We were using v3 and v2 in places. v2 throws a deprecation warning for
node.js. So let's update this in general across the board to the latest
released version.

Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@gmail.com>
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented May 4, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@dbussink dbussink removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels May 4, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v17.0.0 milestone May 4, 2023
@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps merged commit 5be2a82 into vitessio:main May 4, 2023
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented May 4, 2023

I was unable to backport this Pull Request to the following branches: release-15.0, release-16.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants