You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two major test classes AbstractMatrixTest and AbstractVectorTess. So, we have to refactor these classes to use different input data. The main problem is these classes use only 3x3 matrices, but somtimes we need to check other size.
There is prove of concept for new teset methods:
testTranspose_3x3 - for methods w/o paramters | transposes 3x3 matrix;
testMultiply_3x3_3x3 - for methods w/parameters | muptiplies two matrices with size 3x3;
testMultiply_3x3_double - for methods w/parameters | muptiplies 3x3 matrix to double;
testMultiply_3x3_3 - for methods w/parameters | muptiplies 3x3 matrix to 3-items vector;
and so on.
We need better test coverage for rectagle (n>m, n<m) and square matrices.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are two major test classes AbstractMatrixTest and AbstractVectorTess. So, we have to refactor these classes to use different input data. The main problem is these classes use only 3x3 matrices, but somtimes we need to check other size.
There is prove of concept for new teset methods:
testTranspose_3x3 - for methods w/o paramters | transposes 3x3 matrix;
testMultiply_3x3_3x3 - for methods w/parameters | muptiplies two matrices with size 3x3;
testMultiply_3x3_double - for methods w/parameters | muptiplies 3x3 matrix to double;
testMultiply_3x3_3 - for methods w/parameters | muptiplies 3x3 matrix to 3-items vector;
and so on.
We need better test coverage for rectagle (n>m, n<m) and square matrices.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: