Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 26, 2021. It is now read-only.

Admiral cannot connect to remote docker host #284

Open
fir3wall opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Admiral cannot connect to remote docker host #284

fir3wall opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@fir3wall
Copy link

Hey,

Working on version 1.4.1 (both docker and jara deployments acting the same).

Basically what works:

  • Connecting to docker daemon where admiral is running (same host)

What does not work:

  • Connecting to any other docker host

Following error received from GUI:

Error connecting to http://iolive-docker-01.live.dionaws:4243: Unexpected error: No route to host: iolive-docker-01.live.dionaws/10.44.18.38:4243; Reason: {"message":"No route to host: iolive-docker-01.live.dionaws/10.44.18.38:4243","stackTrace":["sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)","sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:717)","io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioSocketChannel.doFinishConnect(NioSocketChannel.java:352)","io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioChannel$AbstractNioUnsafe.finishConnect(AbstractNioChannel.java:340)","io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:632)","io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:579)","io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:496)","io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:458)","io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$5.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:858)","java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)","java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)","java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)"],"statusCode":500,"details":["SHOULD_RETRY"],"documentKind":"com:vmware:xenon:common:ServiceErrorResponse","errorCode":0}

What is weird:

Jar deployment works in same way - after startup it says No route to host on port 4243, but if I will configure some other docker daemon to listen on tcp://0.0.0.0:80 for example ... Admiral will connect.

On docker host firewalld and iptabes are disabled, other container don't have problem connecting to port like 4243 on other host (tested with curl /info), when jar deployment is up in same time on other console I can ran curl directly from host and will work.

Anyone have any idea what is going on there? Why Admiral seems to like only standard ports?

Newest stable docker, selinux disabled doker daemon running on default seccomp profile.

Running out of ideas here why some combination of <same_ip>: works and some <same_ip>: throwing No Route to host (how it is even possible if it got route to IP?)

Thanks
Dariusz

@shadjiiski
Copy link
Contributor

This is strange indeed. Admiral should be able to find route to anything you can curl/ping. Is this also happening on latest code? You can get it from docker hub: docker pull vmware/admiral:dev

@fir3wall
Copy link
Author

Hey,

It does not happen on dev image. Will try provide more info later this week.

Thanks
D

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants