You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2021. It is now read-only.
Opening an issue as follow up to the discussion in #606. By default deployment used for function has no upper limit of CPU and memory. It would be ideal to put uppercap on the resources?
This should prevent rogue function to hog memory resources for e.g. which eventually may leading node not available.
What you expected to happen:
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Anything else we need to know?:
Environment:
Kubernetes version (use kubectl version):
Kubeless version (use kubeless version):
Cloud provider or physical cluster:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?:
Feature request.
What happened:
Opening an issue as follow up to the discussion in #606. By default deployment used for function has no upper limit of CPU and memory. It would be ideal to put uppercap on the resources?
This should prevent rogue function to hog memory resources for e.g. which eventually may leading node not available.
What you expected to happen:
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Anything else we need to know?:
Environment:
kubectl version
):kubeless version
):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: