diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 17182b97..9b9ef27a 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -4711,38 +4711,47 @@

Persistence

Level of Assurance

-Additional information about the security context of authentication events -is often required for compliance reasons, especially in regulated areas -such as the financial and public sectors. Examples include but are not -limited to protection of secret keys, the identity proofing process, and the -form-factor of the authenticator. For example, + +

+ Payment services (PSD 2) and eIDAS introduce such requirements to the security context. Level of -Assurance (LoA) frameworks are classified and defined by, for example, - -eIDAS, - -NIST 800-63-3 and -ISO/IEC 29115:2013, including their requirements for the security -context, and making recommendations on how to achieve them. This might -include strong user authentication and , NIST 800-63-3 and ISO/IEC +29115:2013, including their requirements for the security context, and +making recommendations on how to achieve them. This might include strong user +authentication where FIDO2/WebAuthn can be potential -implementations. A LoA represents the level of confidence that an entity is in -fact that entity. Some regulated use cases require the implementation of a -certain LoA. Since verification relationships such as +href="https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn-2/">WebAuthn can fulfill the +requirement. +

+ +

+Some regulated scenarios require the implementation of a specific level of +assurance. Since verification relationships such as assertionMethod and authentication might be -used in some of these use cases, information about the applied security context -might need to be expressed and provided to a verifier. -Whether and how to encode this information in the DID document data model -is out of scope for this specification, but it should be noted that the DID -document data model can be extended if necessary (see Extensibility section). Section Privacy Considerations remains applicable for -such extensions. +used in some of these situations, information about the applied security context +might need to be expressed and provided to a verifier. Whether and how +to encode this information in the DID document data model is out of scope +for this specification. Interested readers might note that 1) the information +could be transmitted using Verifiable Credentials [[?VC-DATA-MODEL]], and 2) the +DID document data model can be extended to incorporate this information +as described in , and where is applicable for such extensions.