Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? #667

Closed
aisaac opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Is is possible to specify a void:rootResource in DCAT? #667

aisaac opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
dcat feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG

Comments

@aisaac
Copy link
Contributor

aisaac commented Jan 15, 2019

From @nfreire in this email from April:

Dear all,
I'm evaluating the use of DCAT for enabling automatic harveting/crawling
of linked data (LD) datasets.
When using VoID to describe LD datasets, it is possible to indicate a
void:rootResource. This rdf resource will contain all the URIs of a
dataset that enable it to be harvested/crawled completely.
Does DCAT contain any property similar to void:rootResource? Or is this
requirement being taken in consideration for the future versions of DCAT?
(Note: I'm working in the context of aggregation of LD cultural heritage
resources, for Europeana - http://europeana.eu )
Thanks in advance for any feedback or advice.

This is a rather old comment, maybe it is already answered elsewhere. But I have not seen it.

I see a reference to it in at #81 (comment) but I am not sure it covers the original comment fully (as issue #81 seems broader).

@aisaac aisaac added dcat feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG labels Jan 15, 2019
@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

This relates and perhaps duplicates issue #292

@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

Yes, I think this could be considered a duplicate.

@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

The comment referred to the point raised in #292 , which we also discuss in today's DCAT meeting. Closing this issue and we will use #292 instead

@aisaac
Copy link
Contributor Author

aisaac commented Jan 16, 2019

OK, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dcat feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants