Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark blank node property labels as obsolete #90

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2018

Conversation

gkellogg
Copy link
Member

…and generalized RDF datasets.

Fixes #37.

@gkellogg gkellogg requested review from dlongley and iherman October 31, 2018 22:22
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Nov 1, 2018

Damn, the preview tool does not work:-(

index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated
@@ -9895,6 +9885,8 @@ <h2>Changes since JSON-LD Community Group Final Report</h2>
to ensure that <code>@type</code> members are always represented as an array. This
also allows a term to be defined for <code>@type</code>, where the value MUST be a <a>dictionary</a>
with <code>@container</code> set to <code>@set</code>.</li>
<li>The use of <a>blank node identifiers</a> to label properties is obsolete,
and may be removed in a future version of JSON-LD, as is the support for <a>generalized rdf datasets</a>.</li>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rdf -> RDF

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member Author

gkellogg commented Nov 1, 2018

@iherman I don't know what to say about the lake of the Preview/Diffs. Last time it was because of a problem with spec-gen, but it seems to be running properly now. I agree that it's frustrating when it simply doesn't show up. Same problem in w3c/json-ld-api#49.

@gkellogg gkellogg merged commit 06fddbb into master Nov 1, 2018
@gkellogg gkellogg deleted the obsolete-bnode-properties branch November 1, 2018 22:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants