Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accessibility at the Edge, One Year On #51

Open
JaninaSajka opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Accessibility at the Edge, One Year On #51

JaninaSajka opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
session Breakout session proposal track: accessibility

Comments

@JaninaSajka
Copy link

JaninaSajka commented Aug 28, 2023

Session description

Annual Review: Community Group's Work on Accessibility in Overlay Technology

Agenda:
  1. Year-in-Review: Our Achievements
  2. Deep Dive: Guided Reading of the Capabilities Draft Report
  3. Getting on the Same Page: Terminology Discussion
  4. Looking Forward: Next Steps
Details:
  • Year-in-Review:
    • We'll discuss the major milestones and progress we've made in the past year.
  • Deep Dive:
    • Highlighting Key Capabilities: Understand the capabilities present in COTS (commercial off the shelf) products. These are essential in evaluating and contrasting current technologies.
    • Future Potential: We'll discuss aspirational capabilities that hold promise for advancing accessibility, especially when implemented as edge technology.
  • Getting on the Same Page:
    • Let's dive deep into the vocabulary we've come across. We'll carefully explore terms like "overlay", "user agent", "assistive technology", "browser extensions", and other edge-located add-ons to ensure a shared understanding.

Link to the Capabilities Draft Report

Looking forward to an insightful session. See you there!

Session goal

Provide an update and transparency.

Additional session chairs (Optional)

@lwolberg

IRC channel (Optional)

#a11yedge

Who can attend

Anyone may attend (Default)

Session duration

60 minutes (Default)

Other sessions where we should avoid scheduling conflicts (Optional)

#48, #31

Estimated number of in-person attendees

Don't know (Default)

Instructions for meeting planners (Optional)

No response

Agenda, minutes, slides, etc. (Optional)

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Sep 5, 2023

@JaninaSajka, note I updated the description structure slightly to ease integration in the TPAC calendar: our code gets lost when it bumps on h1, h2, or h3 headings in the description of a session for now.

@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Contributor

We’ve published the Zoom recording made for your session. We invite you to review the automatically generated captions and propose fixes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
session Breakout session proposal track: accessibility
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants