-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CR Request for css-view-transitions-1 #561
Comments
transition approved. |
Draft transition announcement sent to comm team. @plehegar please edit your approval comment to the exact string "Transition approved." which apparently Echidna needs. |
draft transition received. |
done |
publication requested (manually) 3 Sept expected 5 Sept |
I'm using bikeshed to do an automatic CR snapshot for this but its stuck on "update-tr-shortlink". @plehegar does this need some manual approval? @tabatkins @svgeesus fyi. |
@khushalsagar , I don't see a trace of your attempt in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2024Mar/ . So, you're getting the error earlier on. Can you point to where you see the error online ? |
Sure, this is the link I got from bikeshed for tracking status: https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=de363264-d5ed-42cd-9cc9-3f7ab0ad125b. |
CSS View Transitions L1 is ready to transition to CR. See discussion at w3c/csswg-drafts#8878.
Document title, URLs, estimated publication date
CSS View Transitions Module Level 1.
Abstract
This module defines the View Transition API, along with associated properties and pseudo-elements. View Transitions is a feature that allows developers to create animated transitions between visual states of the document.
Status
Status is here.
Link to group's decision to request transition
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2023Aug/0001.html
Changes
Changes since FPWD are documented here.
Requirements satisfied
Yes.
Dependencies met (or not)
N/A
Wide Review
Horizontal reviews are tracked here.
The Mozilla RFP and Webkit RFP are additional links for cross-browser review.
Issues addressed
List of issues addressed in this spec is here.
Formal Objections
None
Implementation
Blink implementation is spec compliant. WPTs for the module are here.
Patent disclosures
None. The spec is listed in ipr here
Additional Notes
None
@svgeesus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: