-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
URL IDNA interop #18
Comments
How would this affect developers? Is this something that currently leads to site compat issues, or do web developers have to avoid IDNA domain names because of issues like this? |
Yeah, for instance German speakers cannot have domains with |
I'm going to move this to be a candiate for #9 rather than a standalone proposal. |
@annevk is https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=694157 the right Chromium bug for this? I see Transitional_Processing vs. Nontransitional_Processing but maybe there was a rename at some point? |
Yep, it was renamed in whatwg/url#404. |
Following up on these: I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1788115 on these failures, and that bug's just been fixed, making tomorrow's Firefox Nightly fully pass this test now. Hooray! |
#145 covers a superset of this in Interop 2023. (And the above linked tests are still failing in Chrome.) |
Description
IDNA allows for us non-ASCII code points in domain names.
Specification
https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#idna
Tests
https://wpt.fyi/results/url/toascii.window.html (to be modified by web-platform-tests/wpt#31596 to show the issue better)
Rationale
Firefox and Safari follow the URL Standard and use Transitional_Processing set to false, but Chrome does not. Firefox has some unrelated failures on this particular test, I'm not sure whether those should be in scope or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: