You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello
thanks again for making fTetWild available. I have a question abuot the mesh sizing function,
which as we know from the documentation, and from the examples, should be defined
through a background mesh in .msh format.
Let consider the solid in Fig. 1, and suppose that you would like to apply a sizing
on the triangles laying on the two faces F1 and F2: the two sizing values f1 and f2
could in general be different.
Fig. 1.
Now consider the two following steps:
STEP 1: extract F1 from the solid and enclose it in a bounding box; then generate
a very simple, cartesian mesh of the bounding box. The corresponding .msh mesh
file used for sizing will contain at each node the value f1. See Fig. 2
Fig. 2
STEP2: the same for F2. See Fig. 3
Fig. 3
STEP 3: "merge" the two .msh grids into one, with the "overlapping" result in Fig. 4: the union of the two grids is obvioulsy not well defined as single finite element mesh
Fig. 4
Now the question; will this work?
Thank you and regards
Giovanni
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello
thanks again for making fTetWild available. I have a question abuot the mesh sizing function,
which as we know from the documentation, and from the examples, should be defined
through a background mesh in .msh format.
Let consider the solid in Fig. 1, and suppose that you would like to apply a sizing
on the triangles laying on the two faces F1 and F2: the two sizing values f1 and f2
could in general be different.
Fig. 1.
Now consider the two following steps:
STEP 1: extract F1 from the solid and enclose it in a bounding box; then generate
a very simple, cartesian mesh of the bounding box. The corresponding .msh mesh
file used for sizing will contain at each node the value f1. See Fig. 2
Fig. 2
STEP2: the same for F2. See Fig. 3
Fig. 3
STEP 3: "merge" the two .msh grids into one, with the "overlapping" result in Fig. 4: the union of the two grids is obvioulsy not well defined as single finite element mesh
Fig. 4
Now the question; will this work?
Thank you and regards
Giovanni
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: