You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While the full richness we like in wt may not be 100% supported in xarray, I think there is at least a reasonable minimum viable that may include some fairly generic dimension names (As that is not a concept we have)
Would result in an xarray minimally containing coordinate arrays for the non-scalar variables: w2 along "dim0", w1 and wm along "dim1" and d2 along "dim2"
The scalars would similarly be scalars
The channels would then be arrays with dimensions "dim0, dim1, dim2" (any 1's in the shape get removed, essentially)
I think we can ignore axes for the first go around, at least outside of attrs, unless there is a slick way to do it.
I would make sure that units get put in in the most standardized way (I think there is a de facto standard, but not a "used within xarray itself" standard) and as rich of attrs as we can provide are transferred over (perhaps missing those that are redundant with the information in the structure of xarray already)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While the full richness we like in wt may not be 100% supported in xarray, I think there is at least a reasonable minimum viable that may include some fairly generic dimension names (As that is not a concept we have)
Something like:
Would result in an xarray minimally containing coordinate arrays for the non-scalar variables: w2 along "dim0", w1 and wm along "dim1" and d2 along "dim2"
The scalars would similarly be scalars
The channels would then be arrays with dimensions "dim0, dim1, dim2" (any 1's in the shape get removed, essentially)
I think we can ignore axes for the first go around, at least outside of attrs, unless there is a slick way to do it.
I would make sure that units get put in in the most standardized way (I think there is a de facto standard, but not a "used within xarray itself" standard) and as rich of attrs as we can provide are transferred over (perhaps missing those that are redundant with the information in the structure of xarray already)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: