Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the density of Point Cloud #1

Open
junhua-l opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Question about the density of Point Cloud #1

junhua-l opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@junhua-l
Copy link

Hi, thank you for your great work.

In A.1. End-to-end Rendering Pipeline, Rasterization Radius, I notice a sentence: "In practice, the selection of the radius depends on the density of point cloud, and we can adjust the radius by observing the depth map obtained by rasterization. "

Does it mean that I can change the density of an object's point cloud after preprocessing, s.t, 90%, 70%, 50%, as long as I change the size of rasterization radius accordingly?

SIncerely,

@seanywang0408
Copy link
Collaborator

Not exactly. This sentence means that if you want to tune the radius (which would affect the rendering quality), you can look at the depth map obtained by rasterization. A best radius would be that most pixels in depth map are occupied. If you want to change the density of point clouds after preprocessing, you could change the thres parameter in the config file.

@junhua-l
Copy link
Author

I see. Changing point cloud density is easy. I want to make it suitable for different point cloud densities. For example, if I manually change the same point cloud into different densities, s.t, s.t, 90%, 70%, 50%, would the rendering algorithm still perform satisfactorily? Could you give me some suggestions on what parameters to change in the config file or what I should do for different densities?

Thank you

@seanywang0408
Copy link
Collaborator

The density of point clouds would definitely influence the performance of algorithms. Theoretically, the higher density point clouds has, the better the algorithm performs. However, high density also leads to heavy computation and memory cost. If you want to improve performance when the point cloud is in low density, I would suggest to enlarge the rasterization radius. It could alleviate the issue brought by low density.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants