No license

[avere001]

There is no license associated with this project.

[mickdekkers]

@ythri if you haven't picked anything else yet, I would recommend the MIT License.

[ythri]

While I do not have a license file in the project folder, the html file itself states that the project is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC 4.0 BY), which should be quite similar to MIT from what I see (it also allows commercial use, modification, use in more restrictivly licensed programs and so on while only requiring attribution). But you are right, I should really put a LICENSE file in the git project itself.

@SoullessWaffle do you need this project under MIT, or was this just a personal preference? Because I don't really care too much about the license (as long as it is permissive), and would have no problem of dual licensing or even changing the license.

[mickdekkers]

@ythri just personal preference.