-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Research: Handling of TSO commands #1162
Comments
Just for info. I opened #1168 that is connected with issuing commands |
Trying to formulate a plan to address all the issues attached to this research.
How does this plan look @jellypuno @zFernand0 @crawr ? |
I can address 809 then 875 & 802 in small PRs correcting the existing behavior to close those issues.
1168 can be addressed in it's own PR to fix the bug and have it prompt for creds. We can then address 684, bringing in TSO functionality and add it & Issue MVS Command into the API file and with that fix we will also add the TSO right click menu item and add the |
Hey @JillieBeanSim, This looks good! So just to clarify:
Do you think it is good to re-use the approach for both scenario? Like I do a right-click > Click
Which approach do you prefer here? I only understand the ICommand in ZoweExplorerApi.ts so that makes sense to me. |
Hey @jellypuno after reading the comments in the issues, it looked like having the separate approaches for |
suggestion from @katelynienaber:
|
Still ironing a few things out but hey, Issuing TSO commands woo hoo! I still need to get this action moved into the APIs so extenders can consume it & check for existing TSO profile to get the account number from it if exists. Finally the dreaded unit tests lol! Draft PR open if anyone wants to play around with it #1245 |
good job @JillieBeanSim ! Looking forward to this feature 😄 |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to understand the previous behavior of the Issue TSO command and look into re-implementing it. I also want to get feedback from stakeholders on the expected behavior. Also, the extensibility of the commands and the API for it should be considered.
This is discussed in issues #684 and #809. #875 as well.
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: