-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow searching for members #868
Comments
It is very important for out organisation, that some kind of search possibility or filter is provided, as our source code is placed in one (!) dataset per environment. Imagine scrolling a member list in Zowe/VS Code with more than 200K members... |
You can filter the document trees in Visual Studio Code -> https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/getstarted/userinterface#_filtering-the-document-tree Below is a quick GIF to see it in action. I'd be interested to see if it works with so many members. |
you can use Ctrl + ALT + P to filter the members that you are looking for. This was implemented by PR #592 |
@MikeBauerCA Yes it works. This was tested before and results can be found in issue #327 |
@jellypuno after opening the PDS to see the 30k members, did you try to perform the local filter? Was it immediate? |
@MikeBauerCA We have an issue with the filtering 😆 . I opened issue #992 . |
You can still filter the trees using the method I described above though. Not sure if you still have that large PDS to try it out on. |
Have used the "filter the document trees in Visual Studio Code" for the first time... Wonder why I havent seen this before !? |
In regards to Ctrl + ALT + P, a few of us in the office have tried it, and we all get "Enter pattern..." |
It appears we need to enhance the Zowe Node SDK to support the |
Out of curiosity... what about setting the |
Hi, So now we only need it to be implemented in Zowe Explorer. |
@jelaplan here is my work in progress with allowing member search in the filter search bar, what do you think? If no member filter added to the search filter |
We were discussing as a team about having a new folder icon with a filter created for data set members that have a filter member search attached to them. |
@crawr and @jellypuno I think it is a great start. I like your suggestion to pick a dataset and then filter the members to make it a two step process where the user can drill down - I think that it would be more obvious/apparent that filtering members can be done.
I think the dataset(member) syntax is a standard convention in ISPF. But, it might not be all that obvious to the ZE user. We might want to change the quick pick instruction. Perhaps @BrandonJenkins14 or others could offer some suggestions. The current text is
But we might try putting in an example. Someone with more MF exp probably can suggest something more accurate.
I was not familiar with @MikeBauerCA 's filter approach. I think @bearou said the same thing. I don't think it works that well. In the example, marble appears in the data set name and the member names and so a filter on mable does narrow it down. But, where the member name doesn't appear in the dataset, filtering ends up hiding everything. WRT filtering with cmd+option+p (ctrl+alt+p), I also can't figure that out. I've tried typing a lot of combinations but can't get it to work. Per @JillieBeanSim, a folder icon that indicates an active filter seems promising. It would give some feedback to the user that there is a filter in place. I could make that icon and share it with the team to see if people approve. |
With the implemented feature in v1.12.0 regarding dataset member filtering, can we now close this issue? @jelaplan @JillieBeanSim |
@crawr Did we ever decide if we wanted to also have a right-click action on a data set to filter the members within it? I think that is why it wasn't attached to the PR. If what we have is good or we could create a new issue to add the enhancement at a later time then I vote to close it |
WRT right click filtering / drill down filtering on a data set, maybe you should create a new story for that. I wouldn't want that to hold things up. I still think it is often easier to narrow in on something step-by-step to make the syntax simpler, but what you've done is good so start with that. |
New issue created for the right-click action on PDS for member filter search within the tree view #1241 |
Problem
Users can't search for members of a dataset. They can only search or data sets themselves.
Solution
Allow searching for the names of members as a more detailed thing to access.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: