Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maintainability Items: linting and typing #69

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 5, 2022
Merged

Maintainability Items: linting and typing #69

merged 9 commits into from
Dec 5, 2022

Conversation

klardotsh
Copy link
Member

@klardotsh klardotsh commented Nov 24, 2022

As mentioned on CZO, I figured I'd take a pass at tidying up this codebase before adding more in-house uses of it in some future work. As such, this PR sets up linting (based on xojs/xo's defaults, largely similar to the style in zulip/zulipbot), and refactors the existing send-message action into a strict and functional flavor of TypeScript.

I'd originally intended to just run the existing code through the TypeScript compiler, see what complained, touch those up, and move on, but after realizing I hated the type annotation of string | number | (string|number)[] for the heavily-reassigned to variable, and also that validation/business logic was spread all around the function in difficult-to-trace ways, I went for a more comprehensive refactor.

Opening as a draft to get high-level feeedback on approaches within (particularly, the use of the heavily-Rust-inspired ts-results and ts-async-results helper libraries to get a Result/Maybe monad) while I dig into testing this with my own bot users: as it stands this code passes type checking, but I have not actually run the action in a GitHub Actions environment to regression-test the functionality. update: https://github.com/klardotsh/zulip-gha-playground/actions/runs/3579426796 passes a simple regression test.

The zulip-js.d.ts stubs are purely structural hints: I don't attempt to model the responses from the server, I simply model a subset of the Zulip client itself. As it stands the hints are incomplete enough as to potentially be confusing if integrated to zulip/zulip-js, so I've kept them separate (despite the pitfalls regarding the Response objects mentioned in a comment). I'm open to discussing a proper plan for mainlining those to the proper repo and what that process would look like, or to punting that discussion for later.

Comment on lines +76 to +94
default: {
assertExhaustiveSwitch(kind);
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In case someone reviewing isn't a TypeScript person: this trick will detect any unhandled (or, coincidentally, un-terminated) branches of the enum switch and turn them into compiler errors (familiar to Rust folks, probably other languages too), since never is a bottom type.

src/send-message.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +127 to +131
new AsyncResultWrapper(
Result.wrapAsync(async () =>
zulipInit({
apiKey,
username,
realm,
})
)
)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Frankly this interaction between ts-async-results and the parent library, ts-results, looks pretty gross. There may be a simpler way to do this, but after reading upstream issues in both repos and a lengthy conversation with the type checker, this is the best I came up with so far.

Result.all(
getMandatoryInputFromJob("content"),
getDestinationDetails(),
await getZulipClient()
)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may make sense to instead use AsyncResult.all, though the ergonomics are a little weirder there. It would probably replace the manual call to new AsyncResultWrapper at the top level, though may create two new calls to it on L144+L145. I'll do some investigation on this Monday.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume that using [AsyncResult.all](https://github.com/movesthatmatter/ts-async-results#combining-results) didn't bear any fruit?

Copy link
Collaborator

@alexmv alexmv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for all of the work converting this! I'm excited to have this be more up to the standards of zulip/zulip.

I'm pretty non-qualified for the TS parts of this, but I left a couple comments on things that jumped out at me.

tsconfig.json Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
src/send-message.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/send-message.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
"@typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises": "off",
"unicorn/prefer-top-level-await": "off"
}
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it make sense to apply eslint --fix in this commit? Usually we do that when configuring a linter.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After eslint --fix we'll still have 16 non-auto-fixable (and frankly non-trivial even with human intervention) linter errors. I'd wager probably not worth rolling back to try to fix that since the code being fixed gets fully replaced in the next commits anyway, but that's not a hill I'd die on or anything.

(woods) github-actions-zulip  » (0cfc8ee...) » git checkout 0cfc8eec86b7719aed832f13bd3528c92615d5ef; npm ci; npx eslint --fix ./src/send-message.js 
HEAD is now at 0cfc8ee deps: Install and configure ESLint based on XO defaults.

added 278 packages, and audited 279 packages in 3s

# snip...

/home/j/src/zulip/github-actions-zulip/src/send-message.js
  29:13  error  Unsafe assignment of an `any` value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment
  29:31  error  Unsafe call of an `any` typed value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-call
  29:50  error  Unsafe return of an `any` typed value              @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-return
  29:50  error  Unsafe call of an `any` typed value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-call
  31:9   error  Unsafe assignment of an `any` value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment
  31:14  error  Unsafe call of an `any` typed value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-call
  49:11  error  Unsafe assignment of an `any` value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment
  49:26  error  Unsafe call of an `any` typed value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-call
  57:11  error  Unsafe assignment of an `any` value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment
  57:28  error  Unsafe call of an `any` typed value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-call
  60:50  error  Invalid type "any" of template literal expression  @typescript-eslint/restrict-template-expressions
  62:13  error  Unsafe assignment of an `any` value                @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment
  63:14  error  Invalid type "any" of template literal expression  @typescript-eslint/restrict-template-expressions
  63:32  error  Invalid type "any" of template literal expression  @typescript-eslint/restrict-template-expressions
  67:5   error  Implicit any in catch clause                       @typescript-eslint/no-implicit-any-catch
  75:5   error  Implicit any in catch clause                       @typescript-eslint/no-implicit-any-catch

✖ 16 problems (16 errors, 0 warnings)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to go back to the add-linting commit anyway to address a commit cleanliness comment from Alex so I met in the middle here if that's cool with you: ran lint:fix over the original JS in the commit that adds eslint-config-xo and company, but does not resolve the outstanding 18 (up from 16 because I'd missed eslint-config-xo not being inherently pulled in by eslint-config-xo-typescript, oops) non-auto-fixable errors. It does, however, resolve about 50 auto-fixable errors at that point in the commit history.

That's all now implemented in ecdacd5

@timabbott
Copy link
Member

@Mogztter it'd be great for you to review/test this as well when you get a chance. (@klardotsh for context, he's the original author).

@klardotsh
Copy link
Member Author

I've done the documentation updates I wanted to do and have a successful simple regression test in https://github.com/klardotsh/zulip-gha-playground/actions/runs/3579426796, so I'm marking this ready for review!

@klardotsh klardotsh marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2022 01:18
send-message/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@klardotsh klardotsh mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexmv alexmv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not qualified to review the actual Typescript changes (paging @andersk if he has any ideas about cleaning up the AsyncResultWrapper / wrapAsync in getZulipClient), but the rest of this looks great to me.

Result.all(
getMandatoryInputFromJob("content"),
getDestinationDetails(),
await getZulipClient()
)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume that using [AsyncResult.all](https://github.com/movesthatmatter/ts-async-results#combining-results) didn't bear any fruit?

@alexmv
Copy link
Collaborator

alexmv commented Dec 5, 2022

Not having heard any objections, and since this is a clear improvement on the current state of affairs, I've merged this -- thanks for all of the cleanups, @klardotsh!

@klardotsh klardotsh deleted the typescriptification branch December 6, 2022 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants