Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
131 lines (99 loc) · 4.21 KB

0013-remove-partial-application-super.md

File metadata and controls

131 lines (99 loc) · 4.21 KB
Raw

Remove Partial Application of Non-Final Super Methods (Swift 2.2)

Introduction

Prior to Swift 2.2, calls to superclass methods like super.foo() in Native Swift classes were dispatched statically by recording a reference to the function and calling it directly by its mangled name. In Swift 2.2, class methods invoked via super will use dynamic dispatch. That is, the method will be looked up in the superclass's vtable at runtime. However, if the method is marked with final, it will use the old static dispatch, since no class will be able to override it.

The mechanisms that support currying require thunks to be emitted so that the function can be called at various uncurrying levels. Currying will be removed in Swift 3.0 so, rather than invest more engineering in those mechanisms, I propose that we disallow partial application of non-final methods through super, except where the self parameter is implicitly captured.

Motivation

The motivation of this change is partially motivated by implementation concerns. The machinery for curry thunk mechanism has a lot of assumptions about what the ultimate function call will be: an apply of a static function_ref or a dynamic dispatch through a class_method, which originate in something like doFoo(self.foo) (note self instead of super). Rather than risk regressions stemming from significant replumbing, it would a good tradeoff to pull in this limited portion of the currying removals in Swift 3.0.

Detailed design

In terms of design and implementation, this is a trivial change. In semantic analysis, perform the following check on call expressions: if the call expression is based in super, the referenced function isn't final, and the application does not fulfill all of the parameters, emit an error diagnostic.

Example Code

Illegal: Partial application of non-final method

func doFoo(f: () -> ()) {
  f()
}

class Base {
  func foo()() {}
}

class Derived : Base {
  override func foo()() {
    doFoo(super.foo()) // Illegal - doesn't apply the second time.
  }
}

OK: Partial application of final method

This is safe because the new dynamic super dispatch mechanisms don't kick in for final methods - these fall back to the original static function reference because no class can ever override the original implementation.

func doFoo(f: () -> ()) {
  f()
}

class Base {
  final func foo()() {}
}

class Derived : Base {
  func bar() {
    doFoo(super.foo()) // OK - method is final.
  }
}

The implementation for this change is available on apple/swift/remove-partial-super.

OK: Partial application with implicit self

Partial application of the implicit self parameter is still allowed with this change. When you pass super.foo around, you have in fact partially applied the method - you've captured the self argument present in all Swift method calls. This is safe because no explicit thunks need to be generated at SILGen - the partial_apply instruction will create a closure without additional SIL code.

func doFoo(f: () -> ()) {
  f()
}

class Base {
  func foo() {}
}

class Derived : Base {
  func bar() {
    doFoo(super.foo) // OK - only partially applies self
  }
}

Impact on existing code

Given that we've decided to remove currying outright, this would be a small percentage of that usage. Generally, calls on super are for delegation, where all arguments are often present.

Alternatives considered

The only alternative is to make super method dispatch a citizen in the thunk emission process, which requires deep changes to SILGen, symbol mangling, and IRGen. Although this more comprehensive change would allow us to adopt dynamic super dispatch with no source changes for those writing in Swift, I believe the proposal is a reasonable tradeoff.