When developing framework and reusable code, we need to develop classes that are partially abstract with partial implementation. Protocol and protocol extensions provide this, but they cannot have attributes as classes have. A partial class combines the behavior of a class with the requirement of implementing methods in inherited class like protocols.
Swift-evolution thread: https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160104/005728.html
like pure virtual methods in C++ and abtract classes in Java and C#, frameworks development sometimes required abstract classes facility. An abstract class is like a regular class, but some methods/properties are not implemented and must be implemented in one of inherited classes. An abstract class can inherit from other class, implements protocols and has members attributes as opposite from protocols. Only some methods and properties might be abstract. The goal of abstract classes is to encapsulate a generic behavior that may need some specific implementation methods which are not known in abstract class. This behavior requires attributes that are used by internal abstract class method.
Example : Considere a generic RESTClient that is included in a framework :
class RESTClient {
var timeout = 3000
var url : String {
assert(false,"Must be overriden")
return ""
}
func performNetworkCall() {
let restURL = self.url
print("Performing URL call to \(restURL) with timeout \(self.timeout)")
}
}And an implementation :
class MyRestServiceClient : RESTClient {
override var url : String {
return "http://www.foo.com/client"
}
}As you can see, url properties must be implemented by inherited class and should not be implemented by ancestor. As workaround, we have added assertion, but this error is only detected at runtime and not at compile time and might create crash for end-user.
Another workaround would be to use the delegate/datasource pattern, but the delegate will not be able to use inheritance provided by classes.
We propose to add a new keyword to indicate that a method or a property is abstract and not implemented in current class. This indicates that method or properties must be implemented in inherited class that can be implemented. We propose the keyword abstract that must be added to class and property/method :
abstract class RESTClient {
var timeout = 3000
abstract var url : String { get }
func performNetworkCall() {
let restURL = self.url
print("Performing URL call to \(restURL) with timeout \(self.timeout)")
}
}And an implementation :
class MyRestServiceClient : RESTClient {
override var url : String {
return "http://www.foo.com/client"
}
}An abstract class cannot be instanciated.
Abstract method/property cannot have implementation.
If a class contains one or more abstract methods/properties, it must be declared abstract.
A class that inherits from abstract must be declared abstract if it does not implements all inherited methods/properties.
If you try to implement an abstract class or a inherited class that implements partially abstract methods/properties, you will get a compiler error.
As for override keyword, abstract properties apply on setter, getter and observers.
When declaring an abstract property, you must specify which methods must be implemented : get, set, didSet, willSet.
If you do not specify anything, only setter and getter are made abstract as below :
abstract var url : StringObservers provides default empty implementation.
Type is mandatory for abstract properties since it cannot be inferred.
This change has no impact on existing code, but might change the ABI that is being stabilizing in Swift 3.0.
As first reading, it seems that protocols and protocol extensions might fit the need. It actually does not because abstract classes can have attributs and properties that protocols does not support.
An alternative solution would be to add attributes to protocols and protocol extensions, but this might break compatibility with Objective-C runtime.