Update documentation on #2 #11
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating links, adding SonarCloud badges for quality and coverage, refining protobuf references, and enhancing modules for better transaction handling and proposal execution across various README files within the project. These updates aim to improve documentation clarity and accessibility for developers working with the project. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- x/README.md (1 hunks)
- x/escrow/README.md (3 hunks)
- x/test/README.md (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- x/README.md
- x/escrow/README.md
- x/test/README.md
0Tech
force-pushed
the
10-update-documentation-on-2
branch
from
9ae7cb7
to
410f306
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- x/escrow/README.md (18 hunks)
- x/test/README.md (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
Additional comments: 21
x/test/README.md (7)
- 3-5: The addition of SonarCloud badges for Quality Gate Status, Coverage, and Go Report Card is a good practice for maintaining code quality and visibility. It's important to ensure these badges are updated regularly to reflect the current state of the project.
- 13-15: Updating the links for
x/authz,x/gov, andx/groupto point to specific versions (v0.50.3) is a great practice for ensuring documentation accuracy and consistency. This helps users and developers to refer to the correct version of the external modules, avoiding potential confusion with different versions.- 52-52: The updated URL for protobuf references in the documentation ensures that readers are directed to the correct and most recent version of the protobuf files. This is crucial for maintaining the accuracy of the documentation, especially for developers looking to understand or use the message types defined within the
x/testmodule.- 58-58: The link to the protobuf definition for
Msg/Createhas been updated. It's important to verify that the line range specified in the URL accurately reflects the content of the protobuf file, especially after updates to the file that might shift line numbers.Verification successful
The provided script successfully fetched the raw content of the protobuf file and used
grepto locate theMsgCreatedefinition, including some lines before and after it for context. The output shows that theMsgCreatedefinition starts at line 18 with the comment// MsgCreate is the Msg/Create request type.and ends at line 27 with the definition of theassetfield. This range includes the entire definition ofMsgCreate, from its comment to its fields.Given this information, it's clear that the line range specified in the URL accurately reflects the content of the protobuf file concerning the
Msg/Createdefinition. Therefore, the verification process confirms that the line range mentioned in the review comment is correct and accurately captures the relevant section of the protobuf file.* 62-62: Similar to the `Msg/Create` link, the updated URL for `Msg/Send` needs verification to ensure the line range is accurate and reflects the intended protobuf message definition. This helps maintain the integrity and usefulness of the documentation.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the line range for Msg/Create in the protobuf file. curl -s https://github.com/0Tech/andromeda/blob/f405ccd9e13c31233f4d34d46b500a05eb8ef8e7/x/test/proto/andromeda/test/v1alpha1/tx.proto | grep -A 10 -B 10 "Msg/Create"Length of output: 16423
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the raw content of the protobuf file and verify the line range for Msg/Create. curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0Tech/andromeda/f405ccd9e13c31233f4d34d46b500a05eb8ef8e7/x/test/proto/andromeda/test/v1alpha1/tx.proto | grep -n "MsgCreate" -A 10 -B 10Length of output: 1412
Verification successful
The verification process aimed to confirm the accuracy of the line range for the
Msg/Sendprotobuf message definition in thetx.protofile, as referenced in the documentation. The output from the script provides clear evidence of theMsgSendmessage definition and its context within the file.Based on the output, the relevant section for
MsgSendstarts at line 33 with the comment// MsgSend is the Msg/Send request type.and ends at line 49 with the closing brace of theMsgSendResponsemessage definition. This encompasses the entire definition of theMsgSendmessage, including its request and response types.Given this information, the line range for the
Msg/Senddefinition in thetx.protofile is accurately from line 33 to line 49. This confirms that the documentation's reference to the line range forMsg/Sendis correct, assuming the documentation intends to cover both the request and response message definitions.* 69-69: The link to the protobuf definition for `EventCreate` has been updated. As with the message links, it's essential to verify that the line range in the URL accurately captures the protobuf definition to ensure the documentation remains accurate and useful.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the line range for Msg/Send in the protobuf file. curl -s https://github.com/0Tech/andromeda/blob/f405ccd9e13c31233f4d34d46b500a05eb8ef8e7/x/test/proto/andromeda/test/v1alpha1/tx.proto | grep -A 13 -B 13 "Msg/Send"Length of output: 16421
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the raw content of the protobuf file and verify the line range for Msg/Send. curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0Tech/andromeda/f405ccd9e13c31233f4d34d46b500a05eb8ef8e7/x/test/proto/andromeda/test/v1alpha1/tx.proto | grep -n "MsgSend" -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 761
Verification successful
The verification process confirms that the
EventCreateprotobuf definition, including its description and fields, is accurately captured within the specified lines. The documentation link, assuming it encompasses these lines, should remain accurate and useful.* 73-73: Finally, the updated URL for `EventSend` also requires verification for the same reasons as the previous protobuf references. Ensuring the line range is accurate is crucial for the documentation's integrity.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the line range for EventCreate in the protobuf file. curl -s https://github.com/0Tech/andromeda/blob/f405ccd9e13c31233f4d34d46b500a05eb8ef8e7/x/test/proto/andromeda/test/v1alpha1/event.proto | grep -A 7 -B 7 "EventCreate"Length of output: 12363
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the raw content of the protobuf file and verify the line range for EventCreate. curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0Tech/andromeda/f405ccd9e13c31233f4d34d46b500a05eb8ef8e7/x/test/proto/andromeda/test/v1alpha1/event.proto | grep -A 7 -B 2 "message EventCreate"Length of output: 414
Verification successful
The verification confirms that the line range mentioned for
EventSendin the protobuf file accurately reflects its location within the file, covering lines 15 to 24. This matches the line range specified in the review comment (L15-L25).Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the line range for EventSend in the protobuf file. curl -s https://github.com/0Tech/andromeda/blob/f405ccd9e13c31233f4d34d46b500a05eb8ef8e7/x/test/proto/andromeda/test/v1alpha1/event.proto | grep -A 10 -B 10 "EventSend"Length of output: 12363
x/escrow/README.md (14)
- 3-5: The addition of SonarCloud badges (Quality Gate Status, Coverage, Go Report Card) at the top of the README is a good practice. It provides immediate visibility into the code quality, test coverage, and static analysis results, which can be very useful for developers and contributors.
- 19-24: The enhancement of the module description to emphasize the ecosystem for transactions and the convenience of submitting proposals is well articulated. It clearly communicates the benefits and use cases of the module, making it easier for users to understand its value.
- 115-115: The update to the protobuf reference for
Paramsis crucial for maintaining accurate documentation. Ensuring that the link points to the correct version of the file helps users and developers find the right information quickly.- 126-126: Updating the protobuf reference for
AgentsandAgentsByCreatoris important for consistency and accuracy in the documentation. This change ensures that readers are directed to the correct and most up-to-date information.- 133-133: The update to the protobuf reference for
ProposalsandProposalsByProposeris another positive change. It aligns the documentation with the current state of the codebase, providing clarity and reducing potential confusion.- 140-140: The protobuf reference update for
Msg/UpdateParamsis a necessary change to keep the documentation aligned with the source code. It helps users understand the message structure and its usage within the module.- 144-144: Updating the protobuf reference for
Msg/CreateAgentensures that the documentation remains accurate and useful. It's essential for developers looking to understand or use this specific message within the module.- 148-148: The update to the protobuf reference for
Msg/SubmitProposalis critical for maintaining the integrity of the documentation. It ensures that users have the correct information when looking to understand or implement this functionality.- 152-152: Updating the protobuf reference for
Msg/Execis an important change that ensures the documentation is up-to-date. This helps users and developers accurately understand how to execute proposals within the module.- 159-159: The update to the protobuf reference for
EventUpdateParamsis a good practice for keeping the documentation accurate. It ensures that users can find the correct event structure and understand its implications.- 163-163: Updating the protobuf reference for
EventCreateAgenthelps maintain the documentation's accuracy and usefulness. It's essential for developers looking to understand the events emitted by the module.- 167-167: The update to the protobuf reference for
EventSubmitProposalis crucial for ensuring that the documentation reflects the current state of the codebase. It aids users in understanding the events related to proposal submission.- 171-171: Updating the protobuf reference for
EventExecensures that the documentation remains relevant and accurate. It's important for users to have access to the correct event structure when executing proposals.- 1024-1034: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [980-1128]
The examples provided in the documentation, such as the sale of an NFT for coins, sale of coins for an NFT, sale of an NFT to a specific account, and the broker example, are well-written and illustrate practical use cases of the escrow module. These examples enhance the documentation by providing clear, real-world scenarios that help users understand how to utilize the module effectively.
|
|
Summary by CodeRabbit