Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug introduced in PR #1192 resolved #1196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2021
Merged

bug introduced in PR #1192 resolved #1196

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2021

Conversation

rvilarl
Copy link
Collaborator

@rvilarl rvilarl commented Oct 24, 2021

minor bug resolved.

I saw it while cosidering if the members of Table should me camelCase. ie.: Table.stemWidth rather than Table.STEM_WIDTH. @0xfe what is your preference? Table is now internal.

@rvilarl rvilarl mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2021
@rvilarl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rvilarl commented Oct 27, 2021

@0xfe @mscuthbert this one is minor it should be a minute to merge it.

@mscuthbert mscuthbert merged commit d0220d2 into 0xfe:master Oct 29, 2021
@mscuthbert
Copy link
Collaborator

Merged.

As far as CamelCase vs ALL_CAPS: I'm usually in favor of the former if it makes any sense to ever alter their values at all. But Tables is functioning like a giant const enum so all caps is definitely defensible.

@rvilarl rvilarl deleted the fix/1189 branch December 27, 2022 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants