Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add handling for missing data in CombinedInvoiceSupplementReportV2 #11121

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

zachmargolis
Copy link
Contributor

Similar to #11095

Differences:

  • Adds a failing spec
  • Skips rows with missing data
  • Adds logging to investigate specific data

- also log warning so we can investigate

changelog: Bug Fixes, Reporting, Add handling for error seen first day of the month
@zachmargolis zachmargolis requested a review from a team August 20, 2024 22:47
Copy link
Contributor

@samathad2023 samathad2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment on lines +584 to +608
let(:by_iaa_results) do
[
{
key: 'IAA123',
year_month: '202408',
iaa_start_date: '2024-08-01',
iaa_end_date: '2025-07-31',
},
]
end

let(:by_issuer_results) do
[
{
iaa: 'IAA123',
issuer: service_provider.issuer,
year_month: '202408',
},
{
iaa: 'IAA123',
issuer: service_provider.issuer,
year_month: '202409',
},
]
end
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it really just a mismatch on year_month between iaas and issuers? I thought the error was happening because an issuer year_month was outside of the range of the iaa.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like the result is the same no?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be, it just makes more sense to me now.

@zachmargolis zachmargolis merged commit 25c3436 into main Aug 21, 2024
2 checks passed
@zachmargolis zachmargolis deleted the margolis-combined-invoice-bug branch August 21, 2024 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants