Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update prettier dependency to version 3.3.0 #85

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2024

Conversation

2lambda123
Copy link
Owner

@2lambda123 2lambda123 commented Jun 23, 2024

User description

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade prettier from 3.2.5 to 3.3.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 22 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: prettier from prettier GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:


Description

  • Updated "prettier" dependency version from "3.2.5" to "^3.3.0" in package-lock.json
  • Updated the "prettier" package version to "3.3.0" in package-lock.json
  • Updated the resolved link and integrity for "prettier" in package-lock.json

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
package-lock.json
Update prettier dependency to version 3.3.0 in package-lock.json

package-lock.json
['Updated "prettier" dependency version from "3.2.5" to "^3.3.0"', 'Updated the "prettier" package version to "3.3.0"', 'Updated the resolved link and integrity for "prettier"']

+6/-5     
package.json
Update prettier dependency to version 3.3.0 in package.json

package.json
['Updated "prettier" dependency version from "3.2.5" to "3.3.0"']

+1/-1     

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade prettier from 3.2.5 to 3.3.0.

See this package in npm:
prettier

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/2lambda123/project/5dbca2f9-50aa-41a8-9e4d-7b36e67df46c?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Copy link

cr-gpt bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

Copy link

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Thanks @2lambda123 for opening this PR!

For COLLABORATOR only :

  • To add labels, comment on the issue
    /label add label1,label2,label3

  • To remove labels, comment on the issue
    /label remove label1,label2,label3

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@labels-and-badges labels-and-badges bot added NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/S Denotes a Pull Request that changes 10-29 lines. release This PR is a release labels Jun 23, 2024
Copy link

quine-bot bot commented Jun 23, 2024

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

  • @2lambda123 has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 2358 public PRs merged
  • Don't you recognize them? They've been here before 🎉
  • Here's a good example of their work: HeyGenClone
  • From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with JavaScript and CSS.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: 2lambda123/accumulo#44

Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Jun 23, 2024

PR Details of @2lambda123 in Accenture-sfmc-devtools :

OPEN CLOSED TOTAL
11 19 30

@penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 23, 2024
@penify-dev penify-dev bot changed the title [Snyk] Upgrade prettier from 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 Update prettier dependency to version 3.3.0 Jun 23, 2024
Copy link

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/prettier@3.3.0 environment, filesystem, unsafe 0 8.25 MB prettier-bot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/prettier@3.2.5

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Jun 23, 2024

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

1, because this PR simply updates the prettier dependency version in package-lock.json and package.json files.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

⚡ Possible issues

No

🔒 Security concerns

No

Copy link

codesyncapp bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.

Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Jun 23, 2024

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
Consistency
Update the "prettier" dependency version to "3.3.0" in package-lock.json for consistency

Consider updating the "prettier" dependency version consistently in the package-lock.json
file to maintain coherence.

package-lock.json [23]

-"prettier": "^3.3.0",
+"prettier": "3.3.0",
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion correctly addresses the need to update the "prettier" dependency version in package-lock.json for consistency.

8
Align the "prettier" dependency version in package-lock.json with the version in package.json by using "^3.3.0"

Ensure the "prettier" dependency version in the package-lock.json file matches the version
specified in the package.json file.

package-lock.json [6346]

-"version": "3.3.0",
+"version": "^3.3.0",
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: The suggestion is valid as it aims to align the "prettier" dependency version in package-lock.json with the version in package.json.

7
Ensure consistency by updating the "prettier" dependency version to "^3.3.0" in package.json

Update the "prettier" dependency version to "3.3.0" in the package.json file to match the
package-lock.json file.

package.json [77]

-"prettier": "3.3.0",
+"prettier": "^3.3.0",
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: The suggestion addresses the need for consistency by updating the "prettier" dependency version in package.json to match package-lock.json.

7
Maintenance
Eliminate the unnecessary "integrity" field for the "prettier" dependency in package-lock.json

Remove the unnecessary integrity field for the "prettier" dependency in the
package-lock.json file.

package-lock.json [6347]

-"integrity": "sha512-J9odKxERhCQ10OC2yb93583f6UnYutOeiV5i0zEDS7UGTdUt0u+y8erxl3lBKvwo/JHyyoEdXjwp4dke9oyZ/g==",
+(Remove the "integrity" field)
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

Why: The suggestion suggests removing unnecessary information, which is a good practice for maintenance.

6

Copy link

codeautopilot bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Your organization has reached the subscribed usage limit. You can upgrade your account by purchasing a subscription at Stripe payment link

Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect.

Current plan usage: 103.94%

Have feedback or need help?
Discord
Documentation
support@codeautopilot.com

@2lambda123 2lambda123 merged commit 7c4790e into main Jun 23, 2024
19 of 30 checks passed
Copy link

@gitginie gitginie bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in closing pull request.
Happy coding!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/S Denotes a Pull Request that changes 10-29 lines. release This PR is a release Review effort [1-5]: 1 size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants