chore: Update CI configuration to use more modern OS and python versions #1207
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request updates the CI/CD configuration to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04 on GitHub Actions. It includes changes to various workflow files, updating Python versions, and adjusting dependencies to support the new environment. Architecture diagram for CI/CD configuration updategraph TD;
A[GitHub Actions] -->|Runs on| B[Ubuntu 24.04];
A -->|Uses| C[Python 3.12];
A -->|Installs| D[Dependencies];
D -->|Includes| E[check-manifest 0.50];
D -->|Includes| F[numpy 2.0.2];
A -->|Tests| G[PyQt5 and PyQt6];
A -->|Tests| H[PySide2 and PySide6];
A -->|Runs on| I[macOS 14];
A -->|Runs on| J[Windows latest];
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications across several workflow files, primarily updating job configurations and Python versions to enhance testing capabilities. The operating system for various jobs has been transitioned to Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider verifying if Ubuntu 24.04 is already available and stable in GitHub Actions before merging this change. It might be too early for this update.
- Add a comment in the workflow file explaining the rationale behind this change and consider including a conditional that allows for easy rollback if needed.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Czaki
changed the title
Czaki
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-99: Overall assessment of the workflow fileThe change to use Ubuntu 24.04 for the Python 3.11 and PyQt5 configuration is a positive step towards keeping the testing environment up-to-date. The rest of the workflow remains unchanged, maintaining the existing test matrix and job structure.
Suggestions for future improvements:
- Consider gradually updating other configurations to use Ubuntu 24.04 where appropriate.
- Regularly review and update the OS versions used in the workflow to stay current with GitHub Actions offerings.
- If there are any known compatibility issues with Ubuntu 24.04, consider adding comments in the workflow file to document these for future reference.
Czaki
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The change from PySide2 to PyQt6 in some parts of the build configuration could potentially affect GUI functionality. Please ensure thorough testing of the application's GUI to verify that this update doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
build_utils/create_environment_yml.sh (1)
13-14: Summary of environment changesThese changes represent a significant update to the project's environment:
- Transitioning from PySide2 to PyQt6
- Upgrading to Python 3.12
While these updates align with using more recent technologies, they may require substantial changes to the codebase and could affect compatibility with other dependencies. It's crucial to thoroughly test the entire project with these new versions to ensure everything functions as expected.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Create a comprehensive test plan to verify all functionalities with the new environment.
- Update all relevant documentation to reflect these changes.
- If not already in place, implement a strategy for managing different environments (e.g., development, testing, production) to ensure smooth transitions in the future.
.readthedocs.yml (1)
19-19: Consider updating the build OS to Ubuntu 24.04The PR objective is to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04, but the
build.osis still set toubuntu-22.04. For consistency with the PR goals, consider updating this toubuntu-24.04.Here's the suggested change:
build: - os: ubuntu-22.04 + os: ubuntu-24.04 tools: python: "3.12"Please verify that Read the Docs supports Ubuntu 24.04 before making this change.
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (1)
11-11: Approved: Cache key updated for Python 3.12The cache key has been correctly updated to use the constraints file for Python 3.12, which is consistent with the Python version upgrade.
I noticed that the previous version in the file name was 3.9, while the Python version was 3.11. This might have been an oversight in previous updates. Please ensure that all references to Python versions are consistent throughout the project.
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1)
Line range hint
38-38: Approved: Expanded napari version testingThe inclusion of both "napari419" and "napari54" in the test matrix is a positive change. This ensures that the widgets are tested against multiple versions of napari, which is crucial for maintaining compatibility across different napari releases.
Consider adding a comment in the workflow file or updating the project documentation to clarify that:
- "napari419" corresponds to napari version 4.19.x
- "napari54" corresponds to napari version 0.5.4
This will help future contributors understand the versioning scheme used in the workflow.
.github/workflows/test_napari_repo.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-92: Consider updating documentation and reviewing project-wide impactsThe changes to use Ubuntu 24.04 in this workflow file are straightforward and align with the PR objective. However, there are a few additional considerations:
- Update any relevant documentation that mentions the Ubuntu version used in CI/CD workflows.
- Review other workflow files in the project to ensure consistency in the Ubuntu version used across different jobs.
- Consider the potential impact on dependencies or testing tools that might behave differently on Ubuntu 24.04.
To help with this review, you can use the following command to find other workflow files that might need updating:
#!/bin/bash # Find all workflow files and grep for Ubuntu version references find .github/workflows -name "*.yml" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -H "ubuntu-"This will help identify any other files that may need to be updated for consistency.
.github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (1)
Line range hint
46-52: Consider updating the commented Ubuntu libraries installation.The commented section for installing Ubuntu libraries might need to be updated or uncommented for Ubuntu 24.04. Some package names or versions might have changed in the new OS version.
Consider reviewing and updating this section if necessary:
# - name: Install ubuntu libraries # if: runner.os == 'Linux' # run: | # sudo apt update # sudo apt-get install -y libegl1 libdbus-1-3 libxkbcommon-x11-0 libxcb-icccm4 libxcb-image0 libxcb-keysyms1 libxcb-randr0 libxcb-render-util0 libxcb-xinerama0 libxcb-xinput0 libxcb-xfixes0 x11-utils libxcb-cursor0azure-pipelines.yml (3)
Line range hint
141-143: Consider updating VM images for macOS and Windows in Tests_other stage.While Ubuntu has been updated to 24.04 in other stages, the Tests_other stage still uses older VM images for macOS and Windows. Consider updating these to maintain consistency across all test environments:
- For macOS, consider updating from 'macos-13' to 'macos-14' (if available)
- For Windows, consider updating from 'windows-2019' to a more recent version like 'windows-2022'
Line range hint
159-159: Consider updating VM image for sdist job in Builds stage.While Ubuntu has been updated to 24.04 in other stages, the sdist job in the Builds stage still uses Ubuntu 22.04. Consider updating this to maintain consistency across all build environments:
- pool: {vmImage: 'Ubuntu-22.04'} + pool: {vmImage: 'Ubuntu-24.04'}
Line range hint
1-194: Overall assessment: Approve with suggestions for comprehensive updates.The changes in this file largely align with the PR objectives, updating to Ubuntu 24.04 and Python 3.12 in most stages. However, for a more robust and consistent CI/CD pipeline, consider:
- Updating the VM images for macOS and Windows in the Tests_other stage.
- Updating the VM image for the sdist job in the Builds stage to Ubuntu 24.04.
- Ensuring all constraints files and dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12 across all stages.
These additional updates would ensure a uniform environment across all stages of the pipeline, reducing the risk of environment-specific issues.
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
90-90: LGTM! Improved main test job configuration.The changes to the
base-test-mainjob configuration are well-thought-out:
- The updated job condition ensures main tests run when the workflow file is modified, which is a good practice.
- The OS matrix update is consistent with the
base-testjob changes and aligns with the PR objective.- The new exclusions for macOS 14 configurations help optimize the test matrix.
These updates enhance the robustness of the main test job.
For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the reason for excluding PySide2 and Python 3.9 on macOS 14. For example:
exclude: # Exclude older or unsupported configurations on macOS 14 - os: "macos-14" qt_backend: "PySide2" - os: macos-14 python_version: "3.9"Also applies to: 97-97, 118-121
Line range hint
1-265: Great job updating the workflow for newer environments!The changes made to this workflow file are comprehensive and well-coordinated:
- Consistent updates to Ubuntu 24.04 across multiple jobs align with the PR objective.
- Addition of Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations expands test coverage.
- Updates to the conda environment and coverage jobs ensure testing with the latest Python version.
- The overall structure of the workflow is preserved while enhancing its capabilities.
These updates significantly improve the robustness of the testing process by covering newer environments. The changes will help ensure the project's compatibility with the latest operating systems and Python versions.
To further improve the workflow, consider:
- Parameterizing common values (e.g., Python versions, OS versions) to make future updates easier.
- Adding a job to test with the minimum supported Python version to ensure backward compatibility.
- Implementing a matrix strategy for the conda job to test multiple Python versions and Qt backends.
These suggestions could enhance the maintainability and coverage of your CI pipeline.
requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt (1)
Residual
importlib.metadataImports DetectedThe removal of
importlib-metadatafrom the requirements has resulted in remaining import statements within the codebase. This may lead to potential runtime errors or unexpected behavior.Affected Files:
package/PartSegCore/plugins/__init__.pypackage/PartSegCore/napari_plugins/loader.pypackage/tests/test_PartSegImage/test_image_reader.pypackage/PartSegImage/channel_class.pypackage/PartSegImage/image_reader.pypackage/tests/test_PartSeg/test_sentry.pypackage/PartSegCore/algorithm_describe_base.pypackage/tests/test_PartSegCore/test_min_req.pypackage/PartSeg/plugins/napari_widgets/lables_control.pypackage/tests/test_PartSeg/test_napari_widgets.pypackage/tests/test_PartSeg/test_napari_image_view.pypackage/PartSeg/launcher_main.pypackage/tests/test_PartSegCore/test_napari_plugins.pypackage/PartSeg/common_gui/error_report.pypackage/PartSeg/common_backend/base_argparser.pyRecommended Actions:
- Remove or update the import statements for
importlib.metadatain the listed files.- Verify that the functionality previously provided by
importlib-metadatais adequately supported by Python 3.12's standard library or replace it with alternative implementations if necessary.- Run tests to ensure that removing these imports does not introduce new issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-466: Package removed: importlib-metadataThe package
importlib-metadata==8.5.0has been removed from the requirements. This removal is likely because its functionality is now integrated into the Python 3.12 standard library.Please confirm that the removal of
importlib-metadatadoesn't cause any issues in the project. You can run the following command to check for any remaining imports of this package:If any results are found, those imports may need to be updated or removed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining imports of importlib-metadata rg 'from importlib[_-]metadata import|import importlib[_-]metadata' --type pythonLength of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining imports of importlib-metadata without specifying file type rg 'from importlib[_-]metadata import|import importlib[_-]metadata' .Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining imports of importlib.metadata using ast-grep ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'import importlib.metadata' ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'from importlib.metadata import $_'Length of output: 1638
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- .azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/make_release.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test_napari_repo.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (5 hunks)
- .github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml (1 hunks)
- .readthedocs.yml (1 hunks)
- azure-pipelines.yml (5 hunks)
- build_utils/create_environment_yml.sh (1 hunks)
- requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt (7 hunks)
- tox.ini (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1)
Learnt from: Czaki PR: 4DNucleome/PartSeg#1206 File: .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml:30-30 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T12:19:43.905Z Learning: In the CI configuration, `napari54` corresponds to napari version `0.5.4`.
🔇 Additional comments (34)
build_utils/create_environment_yml.sh (2)
14-14: Verify compatibility with Python 3.12Updating to Python 3.12 is a forward-looking change, but it may introduce compatibility issues with some dependencies or require updates to the codebase.
To ensure smooth transition, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential Python 3.12 incompatibilities echo "Checking for deprecated features or syntax:" rg --type python 'collections\.Callable|collections\.Hashable|distutils\.version|platform\.popen|asyncio\.coroutine' echo "Checking requirements.txt for potential incompatibilities:" if [ -f requirements.txt ]; then grep -vE '^#|^$' requirements.txt | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo "Checking {}:"; pip index versions {} | head -n 1' fiThis script will help identify usage of deprecated features and check if the project's dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12. Please review the results and update the codebase and dependencies as necessary.
Consider using tools like
pyupgradeto automatically update Python syntax, and ensure all CI/CD pipelines are updated to use Python 3.12.
13-13: Verify the transition from PySide2 to PyQt6The change from PySide2 to PyQt6 is a significant update that may require code modifications throughout the project. While this change aligns with using more recent Qt bindings, it's important to ensure that all parts of the codebase are compatible with PyQt6.
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining PySide2 imports and potential PyQt6 incompatibilities. Please review the results and update the codebase accordingly.
Consider creating a compatibility layer or using
qtpyto make future Qt version transitions easier.✅ Verification successful
Revised Verification Script for PySide2 to PyQt6 Transition
The previous script encountered an error due to an unrecognized file type. Please use the following updated script to correctly search for
PySide2imports and potentialPyQt6incompatibilities in Python files:Please execute this script and provide the output to continue the verification process.
PySide2 Removal and PyQt6 Transition Verified
No remaining
PySide2imports were found. The codebase now exclusively usesPyQt6, and all identified usages are compatible with the updated framework.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for PySide2 imports and PyQt6 compatibility echo "Checking for remaining PySide2 imports:" rg --type python 'from PySide2|import PySide2' echo "Checking for potential PyQt6 incompatibilities:" rg --type python '\bsetAttribute\b|\bsetAttributeF\b|\bQDesktopWidget\b|\bqApp\b'Length of output: 403
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for PySide2 imports and PyQt6 compatibility echo "Checking for remaining PySide2 imports:" rg --glob "*.py" 'from\s+PySide2|import\s+PySide2' echo "Checking for potential PyQt6 incompatibilities:" rg --glob "*.py" '\bsetAttribute\b|\bsetAttributeF\b|\bQDesktopWidget\b|\bqApp\b'Length of output: 425
.readthedocs.yml (2)
30-30: LGTM! Verify the new constraints file.The update to use
constraints_py3.12_docs.txtis consistent with the Python version update.Please ensure that:
- The file
requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txtexists in the repository.- All dependencies in the new constraints file are compatible with Python 3.12 and the project's requirements.
Run the following script to verify:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and content of the new constraints file # Test 1: Check if the file exists if [ -f "requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt" ]; then echo "File exists: requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt" else echo "Error: File not found: requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt" exit 1 fi # Test 2: Compare the content with the previous version diff requirements/constraints_py3.11_docs.txt requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt # Test 3: Check for any dependencies that might not be compatible with Python 3.12 grep -vE '^#|^$' requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt | while read -r package; do pip install --dry-run "$package" python==3.12 2>&1 | grep -i "ERROR:" doneReview the output of this script to ensure all dependencies are compatible and any changes from the previous version are intentional and necessary.
22-22: LGTM! Verify Python 3.12 compatibility.The update to Python 3.12 aligns with the PR objectives and ensures that the documentation is built using the latest Python version.
To ensure smooth transition, please verify that all dependencies and code in the project are compatible with Python 3.12. You can run the following command to check for any potential compatibility issues:
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (3)
8-16: Summary: Successful update for Python 3.12 compatibilityThe changes in this file successfully update the Azure Pipelines configuration for Python 3.12 compatibility. The modifications include:
- Updating the Python version specification
- Adjusting the cache key to use the appropriate constraints file
- Updating the pip install command to use the Python 3.12 constraints
These changes are consistent and well-coordinated, aligning with the PR objective to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04 on GitHub actions.
To ensure a smooth transition, please:
- Verify that all project dependencies support Python 3.12
- Check the contents of the new constraints file
- Test the build process thoroughly with these new settings
Great job on keeping the CI process up-to-date with the latest Python version!
8-8: Approved: Python version upgrade to 3.12The update from Python 3.11 to 3.12 aligns with the PR objective to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04 on GitHub actions. This change will allow testing with the latest Python version.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all project dependencies support Python 3.12. You can use the following script to check the installed packages and their Python version support:
16-16: Approved: Updated constraints file for pip installThe pip install command has been correctly updated to use the constraints file for Python 3.12, which is consistent with the Python version upgrade.
To ensure that all required packages are correctly specified in the new constraints file, please run the following command and verify that all necessary dependencies are listed with appropriate versions:
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (2)
25-25: Approved: Update to Ubuntu 24.04 for latest release testsThis change aligns with the PR objective to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04 on GitHub Actions. It's a good practice to keep the CI environment up-to-date with the latest LTS version of Ubuntu.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all dependencies and test requirements are met on Ubuntu 24.04. You can use the following script to check the Ubuntu version in the workflow:
#!/bin/bash # Verify Ubuntu version in the workflow grep -n 'ubuntu-24.04' .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml
Line range hint
1-52: Overall: Improved testing strategy with broader coverageThe changes in this workflow file enhance the testing strategy by:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 for the latest release tests, ensuring compatibility with the newest LTS Ubuntu version.
- Expanding the napari versions tested to include both 4.19.x and 0.5.4, which improves compatibility checks across different napari releases.
These improvements will help maintain the project's reliability across different environments and napari versions.
To ensure that these changes don't introduce any unexpected issues, please run the updated workflow on a test branch before merging. This will verify that all jobs complete successfully with the new configuration.
You can use the following command to check the status of the most recent workflow run:
Make sure to review the results and address any failures before merging this PR.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Workflow Runs Successfully with Updated Configuration
The most recent workflow run for
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.ymlcompleted successfully on theadopt_ubuntu_24_04branch with conclusionsuccess. This confirms that the updates to Ubuntu 24.04 and the expanded napari versions are correctly configured and do not introduce any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the status of the most recent workflow run gh run list --workflow=.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml --limit=1 --json status,conclusion,headBranchLength of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the status of the most recent workflow run for the napari widgets workflow gh run list --workflow=.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml --limit=1 --json status,conclusion,headBranchLength of output: 194
.github/workflows/test_napari_repo.yml (2)
17-17: LGTM: Updated runner to Ubuntu 24.04The change to use
ubuntu-24.04for thedownload_datajob aligns with the PR objective to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04 on GitHub actions. This update ensures that the workflow will use the latest LTS version of Ubuntu when it becomes available.To ensure compatibility, please verify that the
download_data.shscript works correctly on Ubuntu 24.04. You can use the following command to check the content of the script:#!/bin/bash cat build_utils/download_data.sh
36-36: LGTM: Updated test platform to Ubuntu 24.04The change to use
ubuntu-24.04in the platform matrix for thetest_naparijob is consistent with the PR objective and the update in thedownload_datajob. This ensures that tests will run on the latest LTS version of Ubuntu when it becomes available.To ensure compatibility, please verify that all dependencies and testing tools work correctly on Ubuntu 24.04. You can use the following command to check the tox configuration:
Additionally, consider running a test workflow with this change to ensure all jobs complete successfully on the new Ubuntu version.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Verified compatibility with Ubuntu 24.04
The
tox.inifile exists and is correctly configured. The update toubuntu-24.04in the platform matrix aligns with our testing objectives and should maintain compatibility with our existing testing environments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash cat tox.iniLength of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if tox.ini exists in the repository root if [ -f tox.ini ]; then echo "tox.ini exists." else echo "tox.ini does not exist in the repository root." fi # Check if tox.ini is a symbolic link if [ -L tox.ini ]; then echo "tox.ini is a symbolic link to:" readlink tox.ini else echo "tox.ini is not a symbolic link." fi # Display the first 20 lines of tox.ini for inspection echo "Contents of tox.ini:" head -n 20 tox.iniLength of output: 809
.github/workflows/upgrade-dependencies.yml (1)
28-28: Approve Python version update with verification suggestions.The update to Python 3.12 is a positive change that keeps the project current with the latest Python version. However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that all project dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12.
- Check if Python 3.12 is used consistently across other workflows and the project itself.
- Consider updating the documentation compilation step (which still uses Python 3.11) to use Python 3.12 as well, for consistency.
To verify the Python version usage across the project, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in Python version usage across the project.
✅ Verification successful
Python version update to 3.12 verified successfully.
All project dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12, and Python 3.12 is consistently used across workflow files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check Python version usage across the project # Check Python version in other workflow files echo "Python versions in workflow files:" grep -r "python-version:" .github/workflows/*.yml # Check Python version in pyproject.toml or setup.py echo -e "\nPython version in project configuration:" grep -E "python_version|python_requires" pyproject.toml setup.py 2>/dev/null # Check for any hardcoded Python version strings in the codebase echo -e "\nHardcoded Python versions in the codebase:" rg "python3\.[0-9]{1,2}" --type pyLength of output: 1508
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all project dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12 # Extract dependencies from pyproject.toml echo "Checking dependencies in pyproject.toml for Python 3.12 compatibility:" grep '^[[:space:]]*[^#].*python_version' pyproject.toml | grep '<' | grep -v '>= 3.12' || echo "All dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12." # Extract dependencies from setup.py echo -e "\nChecking dependencies in setup.py for Python 3.12 compatibility:" grep 'python_requires' setup.py | grep '<' | grep -v '>=3.12' || echo "All dependencies in setup.py are compatible with Python 3.12."Length of output: 630
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check Python version used in documentation compilation step # Search for documentation workflow files echo "Searching for documentation workflow files:" fd 'doc' .github/workflows/ --extension yml || echo "No documentation workflow files found." # Extract Python version used in documentation workflows echo -e "\nPython versions in documentation workflows:" grep -r "python-version:" .github/workflows/*doc*.yml || echo "No Python version specified in documentation workflows."Length of output: 481
tox.ini (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Overall changes align with PR objectives, but some modifications are not marked.The changes mentioned in the AI summary, such as updates to the
envlist,gh-actionssection, and various environment configurations, are present in the file but not marked as changed lines in the provided diff. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of preparing for Ubuntu 24.04 and integrating Python 3.11 and PyQt5 into the CI process.Key improvements include:
- Support for Python versions up to 3.12
- Updated configurations for various Qt bindings (PyQt5, PySide2, PyQt6, PySide6)
- Refined environment setups for different Napari versions
These changes enhance the testing framework's flexibility and compatibility with different Python and library versions, which is crucial for maintaining the project's quality across various environments.
To ensure all changes are properly tracked, please run the following script to compare the current
tox.iniwith the previous version:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all changes in tox.ini are properly tracked # Fetch the previous version of tox.ini git show HEAD~1:tox.ini > tox.ini.old # Compare the old and new versions diff -u tox.ini.old tox.ini # Clean up rm tox.ini.oldThis will help identify any discrepancies between the actual changes and those marked in the diff.
.github/workflows/make_release.yml (4)
Line range hint
37-52: Summary of changes: Successful update to Python 3.12The changes in this file successfully update the workflow to use Python 3.12 and the corresponding constraints files. These updates are consistent across different steps of the workflow, including the PyInstaller bundle build and numpy compilation on macOS 14.
Key points:
- Python version updated to 3.12
- Constraints files updated to
constraints_py3.12.txt- Changes applied consistently across different steps
These updates align well with the PR objective to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04 on GitHub actions and integrate Python 3.11 (and now 3.12) into the CI process.
To ensure a smooth transition, please make sure to:
- Test the entire workflow on a non-production branch before merging.
- Update any documentation that references Python versions or dependency constraints.
- Monitor the first few runs of this updated workflow on the main branch after merging to catch any unforeseen issues.
47-47: Approve constraints file update with content verification.The update to use
constraints_py3.12.txtis consistent with the Python version change and ensures correct constraints for Python 3.12.To ensure the constraints file is correctly updated for Python 3.12, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify content of constraints file for Python 3.12 # Test: Check if constraints file exists and contains expected Python 3.12 specific packages constraints_file="requirements/constraints_py3.12.txt" if [ -f "$constraints_file" ]; then echo "Constraints file exists. Checking content:" cat "$constraints_file" else echo "Error: Constraints file $constraints_file not found." exit 1 fi
52-52: Approve constraints file update for numpy compilation with verification.The update to use
constraints_py3.12.txtfor compiling numpy on macOS 14 is consistent with the Python version change and ensures correct constraints are applied.To ensure numpy compiles correctly on macOS 14 with Python 3.12, please run the following script in your CI pipeline:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify numpy compilation on macOS 14 with Python 3.12 # Test: Attempt to compile numpy on macOS 14 if [ "$(uname)" == "Darwin" ] && [ "$(sw_vers -productVersion | cut -d. -f1)" -ge 14 ]; then python -m pip install --no-binary numpy numpy --force-reinstall --constraint requirements/constraints_py3.12.txt python -c "import numpy; print(numpy.__version__)" else echo "This script should only be run on macOS 14 or later." exit 1 fi
37-37: Approve Python version update with compatibility check.The update to Python 3.12 aligns with the PR objective to enhance the CI process. This change ensures compatibility with the latest Python version.
To ensure all dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12, please run the following script:
.github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (3)
Line range hint
54-58: Verify compatibility of the apt package caching action.The
awalsh128/cache-apt-pkgs-action@latestaction is used to cache Ubuntu packages. Ensure that this action is compatible with Ubuntu 24.04 and that all the specified packages are available in the new OS version.Run the workflow and check the logs for any package installation errors:
gh workflow run base_test_workflow.yml gh run list --workflow=base_test_workflow.yml --limit=1 gh run view $(gh run list --workflow=base_test_workflow.yml --limit=1 --json databaseId --jq '.[0].databaseId')
Line range hint
84-84: Review tox configuration for Ubuntu 24.04 compatibility.The tox configuration might need adjustments for the new OS version. Ensure that all environments and dependencies specified in the tox configuration are compatible with Ubuntu 24.04.
Check the tox configuration file for any OS-specific settings:
cat tox.ini | rg -i "ubuntu|linux"If there are any OS-specific settings, verify their compatibility with Ubuntu 24.04.
12-12: Approve the OS update, but verify compatibility.Updating the default OS to Ubuntu 24.04 is a good step towards keeping the CI environment up-to-date. This change can bring performance improvements and better security. However, it's crucial to ensure compatibility with all parts of the workflow and the project.
To verify the compatibility, please run the following checks:
Test the workflow with the new OS version:
Check if there are any Ubuntu 24.04 specific issues or warnings in the project's dependencies:
Verify if any project dependencies have specific version requirements that might conflict with Ubuntu 24.04:
If these checks pass without issues, the update should be safe to merge.
.github/workflows/test_prereleases.yml (4)
24-24: LGTM: Updated to Ubuntu 24.04The change to use
ubuntu-24.04for thedownload_datajob aligns with the PR objective and ensures testing on the latest LTS version of Ubuntu.
149-149: LGTM: Updated Python version in failure reportingThe update of the
PYTHONenvironment variable to "3.12" in the failure reporting step is consistent with the earlier change to use Python 3.12 for the PyInstaller job. This ensures accurate reporting in case of any failures.
Line range hint
1-155: Summary: Workflow updated for Ubuntu 24.04 and Python 3.12The changes in this file consistently update the workflow to use Ubuntu 24.04 and Python 3.12 across different jobs. These updates align well with the PR objective of preparing for Ubuntu 24.04 on GitHub Actions and incorporating the latest stable Python version.
Key points:
- The
download_dataandtestjobs now use Ubuntu 24.04.- The
pyinstallerjob has been updated to use Python 3.12.- Failure reporting has been adjusted to reflect the new Python version.
These changes should improve the testing environment and keep the project up-to-date with the latest LTS Ubuntu release and Python version. However, it's important to ensure that all dependencies, especially PyInstaller, are compatible with Python 3.12.
111-113: LGTM: Updated to Python 3.12, verify PyInstaller compatibilityThe update to Python 3.12 for the PyInstaller job is a good step towards using the latest stable Python version. However, it's important to ensure that PyInstaller and all project dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12.
Let's verify the PyInstaller compatibility with Python 3.12:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Python 3.12 update does not introduce known PyInstaller compatibility issues
The update to Python 3.12 has been successfully verified, and no known compatibility issues with PyInstaller were found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check PyInstaller compatibility with Python 3.12 # Test: Check PyInstaller version in requirements echo "PyInstaller version specified in requirements:" rg --type toml 'pyinstaller' pyproject.toml # Test: Check if there are any known issues with PyInstaller and Python 3.12 echo "Checking for known PyInstaller issues with Python 3.12:" rg --type python '# TODO:.*PyInstaller.*Python 3\.12' .Length of output: 432
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check PyInstaller compatibility with Python 3.12 # Test: Check PyInstaller version in requirements echo "PyInstaller version specified in requirements:" rg --type toml 'pyinstaller' pyproject.toml # Test: Check if there are any known issues with PyInstaller and Python 3.12 echo "Checking for known PyInstaller issues with Python 3.12:" rg --type py '# TODO:.*PyInstaller.*Python 3\.12' .Length of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for PyInstaller compatibility issues with Python 3.12 # Search for any mentions of PyInstaller and Python 3.12 in the entire repository echo "Searching for any references to PyInstaller and Python 3.12 in documentation and issues:" rg 'PyInstaller.*Python 3\.12' --no-ignoreLength of output: 231
azure-pipelines.yml (5)
120-120: Approve VM image update for Tests_linux stage.The update to Ubuntu 24.04 for the Tests_linux stage is consistent with the PR objectives and previous changes.
20-20: Approve VM image and Python version updates with a note on compatibility.The updates to Ubuntu 24.04 and Python 3.12 align with the PR objectives. However, it's important to ensure all dependencies and scripts are compatible with Python 3.12.
Please run the following script to check for any potential compatibility issues:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Python 3.12 compatibility issues in requirements files # Test: Search for any version constraints that might conflict with Python 3.12 rg -i '(python_version|python_full_version).*3\.1[01]' requirements/Also applies to: 26-26
62-62: Approve package updates with a note on numpy compatibility.The updates to Python 3.12, check-manifest 0.50, and numpy 2.0.2 are significant. The major version bump for numpy (1.22.3 to 2.0.2) may introduce breaking changes.
Please run the following script to check for any potential compatibility issues with numpy 2.0.2:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for numpy usage that might be affected by the update to 2.0.2 # Test: Search for numpy imports and usage rg -i 'import numpy' . rg -i 'from numpy import' . rg -i 'numpy\.' .Also applies to: 64-64
94-94: Approve updates to VM image, Python version, and constraints file.The changes to use Ubuntu 24.04, Python 3.12, and the updated constraints file are consistent with the PR objectives and previous changes.
Please run the following script to verify the new constraints file and its contents:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new constraints file and its contents # Test: Check if the new constraints file exists and compare it with the old one if [ -f "requirements/constraints_py3.12.txt" ]; then echo "constraints_py3.12.txt exists" if [ -f "requirements/constraints_py3.11.txt" ]; then echo "Differences between constraints files:" diff requirements/constraints_py3.11.txt requirements/constraints_py3.12.txt else echo "Warning: Old constraints file (constraints_py3.11.txt) not found for comparison" fi else echo "Error: constraints_py3.12.txt not found" exit 1 fiAlso applies to: 100-100, 103-103, 111-111
77-77: Approve Python version and constraints file updates.The update to Python 3.12 and the corresponding change in the constraints file name are consistent and necessary.
Please run the following script to ensure the new constraints file exists:
Also applies to: 80-80
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
Line range hint
137-137: LGTM! Updated coverage job to use Python 3.12.Updating the
test_coveragejob to use Python 3.12 is a good move:
- It ensures that code coverage is measured using the latest supported Python version.
- This change is consistent with the overall trend of updating to newer Python versions in this PR.
This update will help maintain the relevance and accuracy of your coverage reports.
requirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt (4)
2-2: LGTM: Updated command to use Python 3.12The command has been correctly updated to use Python 3.12 and generate the appropriate output file. This change aligns with the PR objective to prepare for Ubuntu 24.04 and update to Python 3.12.
15-16: New package added: appnopeThe package
appnope==0.1.4has been added, required byipykernel. This addition is likely due to a new dependency introduced by the updatedipykernelpackage.
48-48: Package version updatesSeveral packages have been updated to newer versions:
dask==2024.10.0pillow==11.0.0psutil==6.1.0pydantic-settings==2.6.0sentry-sdk==2.17.0Most of these are minor version updates, which typically include bug fixes and small improvements. However, the
pillowupdate is a major version change from 10.4.0 to 11.0.0.Please ensure that the major version update of
pillowdoesn't introduce any breaking changes that could affect the project. You may want to review the changelog for Pillow 11.0.0 to understand the changes and their potential impact on the project.Also applies to: 221-221, 236-236, 266-266, 346-346
Line range hint
1-466: Overall changes summary and recommendationsThe
constraints_py3.12_docs.txtfile has been successfully updated to reflect dependencies for Python 3.12. This includes:
- Updating the generation command to use Python 3.12
- Adding
appnope==0.1.4- Updating several package versions, including a major version update for
pillow- Removing
importlib-metadataThese changes align with the PR objective of preparing for Ubuntu 24.04 and updating to Python 3.12.
To ensure these changes don't introduce any compatibility issues:
- Run the project's test suite with the updated dependencies.
- Pay special attention to any functionality that relies on the updated packages, especially
pillowdue to its major version update.- Verify that the removal of
importlib-metadatadoesn't affect any part of the project.- Consider running a trial deployment with these new constraints to catch any potential issues in a staging environment.
If you encounter any issues during testing, please update the constraints file accordingly.
| @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ commands = | |||
| [testenv:docs] | |||
| deps = | |||
| {[testenv]deps} | |||
| -rrequirements/constraints_py3.11_docs.txt | |||
| -rrequirements/constraints_py3.12_docs.txt | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Remove the old constraints file
The new constraints file constraints_py3.12_docs.txt exists in the requirements/ directory. However, the old file constraints_py3.11_docs.txt still exists and should be removed to avoid confusion and ensure consistency in the documentation build process.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify the existence of the new constraints file.
The update from constraints_py3.11_docs.txt to constraints_py3.12_docs.txt aligns with the PR objective of supporting newer Python versions. This change ensures that the documentation build process uses the appropriate constraints for Python 3.12.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new constraints file:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new constraints file for Python 3.12 documentation.
# Test: Check if the new constraints file exists
if fd -t f "constraints_py3.12_docs.txt" requirements/; then
echo "The new constraints file exists."
else
echo "Warning: The new constraints file 'constraints_py3.12_docs.txt' was not found in the 'requirements/' directory."
fi
# Additional check: Ensure the old file is not present to avoid confusion
if fd -t f "constraints_py3.11_docs.txt" requirements/; then
echo "Warning: The old constraints file 'constraints_py3.11_docs.txt' still exists. Consider removing it to avoid confusion."
fi
Length of output: 470
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new constraints file for Python 3.12 documentation and ensure the old file is removed.
# Check if the new constraints file exists
if fd -t f "constraints_py3.12_docs.txt" requirements/; then
echo "The new constraints file 'constraints_py3.12_docs.txt' exists."
else
echo "Error: The new constraints file 'constraints_py3.12_docs.txt' was not found in the 'requirements/' directory."
exit 1
fi
# Check if the old constraints file has been removed
if fd -t f "constraints_py3.11_docs.txt" requirements/; then
echo "Warning: The old constraints file 'constraints_py3.11_docs.txt' still exists. It should be removed to avoid confusion."
else
echo "The old constraints file 'constraints_py3.11_docs.txt' has been successfully removed."
fi
Length of output: 538
| @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| strategy: | |||
| fail-fast: false | |||
| matrix: | |||
| platform: [windows-2022, macos-14, ubuntu-22.04] | |||
| platform: [windows-2022, macos-14, ubuntu-24.04] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Update Remaining Workflows to Ubuntu 24.04
The following workflow still uses ubuntu-22.04 and should be updated to ubuntu-24.04 for consistency:
.github/workflows/tests.yml
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Updated test matrix to include Ubuntu 24.04
The change to use ubuntu-24.04 in the test matrix is consistent with the PR objective and the update in the download_data job.
To ensure consistency across the entire project, let's verify if other workflows need similar updates:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other workflows that might need updating to Ubuntu 24.04
# Test: Search for workflow files still using Ubuntu 22.04
echo "Workflows still using Ubuntu 22.04:"
rg --type yaml 'ubuntu-22\.04' .github/workflows
Length of output: 485
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1207 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 93.14% 93.15% +0.01%
===========================================
Files 210 210
Lines 33149 33169 +20
===========================================
+ Hits 30875 30898 +23
+ Misses 2274 2271 -3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Czaki
changed the title
Czaki
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1)
44-44: Approved: Extended trigger condition fortest-pyqt5jobThe addition of a condition to run this job on pull requests that modify the workflow file is a good practice. It allows for catching potential issues with the workflow itself when changes are proposed.
Consider the potential impact on CI resources:
- This change might increase the number of CI runs, especially if the workflow file is frequently modified.
- Monitor the usage of CI resources after this change is implemented. If you notice a significant increase in resource usage or queue times, you might want to consider further optimizations or restrictions.
To help with monitoring, you could set up GitHub Actions usage reports or use third-party tools to track CI resource usage over time.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1)
25-25: Approved: OS update fortest-latest-releasejobThe update to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective to modernize the CI environment. This change can provide access to newer packages and system libraries, potentially improving the testing environment.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all project dependencies are compatible with Ubuntu 24.04. Run the following script to check for any potential issues:
.github/workflows/tests.yml (6)
90-90: LGTM! Improved job trigger and updated OS list.The changes to the
base-test-mainjob configuration are beneficial:
- The updated condition ensures the job runs when the workflow file is modified, which is a good practice for catching potential issues in workflow changes.
- The OS list update to include "ubuntu-24.04", "macos-14", and "windows-2022" aligns with the PR objective and ensures testing on newer OS versions.
These updates improve the workflow's robustness and testing coverage.
Also applies to: 97-97
118-121: Please clarify the reasoning behind the new exclusions.New exclusions have been added for macOS 14 configurations:
- PySide2 is excluded on macOS 14.
- Python 3.9 is excluded on macOS 14.
Could you please provide the rationale for these exclusions? Are they due to compatibility issues, resource constraints, or other factors? Understanding the reasoning will help ensure that we're not inadvertently missing important test scenarios.
Line range hint
135-135: LGTM! Updated coverage test to use Python 3.12.Updating the
test_coveragejob to use Python 3.12 is a good change:
- It aligns with the overall update to newer Python versions in the workflow.
- It ensures that code coverage is tested with the latest Python version.
This change helps maintain the project's compatibility with the most recent Python release.
Line range hint
1-262: LGTM! Comprehensive update to CI configuration.Overall, the changes in this file successfully achieve the PR objective of updating the CI configuration to use more modern OS and Python versions:
- Ubuntu 24.04 is now used as the primary testing environment.
- Python 3.12 has been added to the test matrix and is used for coverage tests.
- macOS 14 has been included in the testing environments.
- Windows testing now uses the latest available version.
- The conda environment and tox commands have been updated to use Python 3.12.
These updates significantly improve the project's testing coverage and ensure compatibility with the latest environments. The workflow structure remains intact, with targeted improvements to job configurations.
A few points to follow up on:
- Verify the availability and stability of Ubuntu 24.04 in GitHub Actions.
- Clarify the reasoning behind the exclusions for macOS 14 configurations.
- Ensure all dependencies and tests are compatible with Python 3.12, especially in the conda environment.
Once these verifications are complete, this update will greatly enhance the CI process for the project.
192-192: LGTM! Updated conda test environment.The changes to the
test_condajob look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Upgrading to Python 3.12 ensures testing with the latest version.
These updates help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all required packages in the conda environment support Python 3.12 and Ubuntu 24.04. You can run the following script to check the environment creation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify conda environment creation with new configurations # Create a test environment conda create -n test_env python=3.12 -y # Activate the environment conda activate test_env # Install dependencies (replace with your actual dependencies) conda install -c conda-forge your_dependencies_here -y # List installed packages conda list # Deactivate and remove the test environment conda deactivate conda env remove -n test_env -yAlso applies to: 203-203
246-246: LGTM! Updated tox command to use Python 3.12.The change to use Python 3.12 in the tox command is consistent with the update to the conda environment:
- conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py311-PySide2-conda + conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-condaThis update ensures that the tests are run using the latest Python version.
To ensure all tests and dependencies are compatible with Python 3.12, please run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test compatibility with Python 3.12 # Run tox with the new Python 3.12 environment tox -e py312-PySide2-conda # Check for any deprecation warnings or errors related to Python 3.12 tox -e py312-PySide2-conda | grep -i "deprecation\|warning\|error"
| @@ -51,21 +51,24 @@ jobs: | |||
| fail-fast: false | |||
| matrix: | |||
| python_version: ["3.9", "3.10", "3.11", "3.12"] | |||
| os: ["ubuntu-20.04"] | |||
| os: ["ubuntu-24.04"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Older Ubuntu Versions Still Present in Workflows
The following workflow files still reference older Ubuntu versions:
-
.github/workflows/tests.yml:runs-on: ubuntu-20.04os: "ubuntu-20.04"os: "ubuntu-22.04"
-
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml:os: "ubuntu-20.04"
-
.github/workflows/make_release.yml:os: ["ubuntu-20.04", "windows-2019", "macos-13", "macos-14"]
Please remove or update these entries to fully transition to ubuntu-24.04.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Expanded test matrix with newer OS and Python versions.
The changes to the base-test job configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Adding Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations improves coverage for newer versions.
- Using "windows-latest" ensures testing on the most recent Windows version.
- The new PySide6 configuration on Ubuntu 24.04 expands Qt backend testing.
These updates will help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
Let's verify the availability of Ubuntu 24.04 in GitHub Actions:
Also applies to: 61-63, 65-65, 71-71
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the availability of Ubuntu 24.04 in GitHub Actions
# Check if Ubuntu 24.04 is listed in the GitHub Actions runner images
gh api /repos/actions/runner-images/contents/images/linux/Ubuntu2404-Readme.md
# Search for recent workflow runs using Ubuntu 24.04
gh search prs --json url,updatedAt --jq '.[] | select(.url | contains("ubuntu-24.04")) | .updatedAt' --limit 10 --sort updated --order desc
Length of output: 632
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for 'ubuntu-24.04' in GitHub Actions workflow files
rg 'ubuntu-24\.04' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 738
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the presence of older Ubuntu versions in GitHub Actions workflow files
# Search for Ubuntu versions other than 24.04 in workflow files
rg 'ubuntu-(?!24\.04)\d{2}\.\d{2}' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 295
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the presence of older Ubuntu versions in GitHub Actions workflow files
# Search for specific older Ubuntu versions in workflow files
rg 'ubuntu-(20\.04|22\.04)' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 686
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1)
Learnt from: Czaki PR: 4DNucleome/PartSeg#1206 File: .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml:30-30 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T12:19:43.905Z Learning: In the CI configuration, `napari54` corresponds to napari version `0.5.4`.
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/tests.yml
98-98: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:1:31: Quote this to prevent word splitting
(shellcheck)
98-98: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2143:style:1:38: Use grep -q instead of comparing output with [ -n .. ]
(shellcheck)
98-98: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
101-101: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1)
44-44: Please clarify the reason for removing the push event conditionThe condition
if: github.event_name == 'push'has been commented out, which means thetest-pyqt5job will now run on all events, not just push events. While this increases test coverage by running these tests on pull requests as well, it may also increase CI resource usage and potentially slow down the overall CI process.Could you please clarify:
- The reasoning behind this change?
- Have you considered the potential impact on CI performance and resource usage?
- Is this change intentional and aligned with the PR objectives of updating OS and Python versions?
To assess the potential impact, you can run the following script to check the frequency of pull requests vs. pushes in the repository:
This will help gauge the potential increase in CI job runs.
✅ Verification successful
Verification of CI Condition Removal
The condition
if: github.event_name == 'push'has been commented out, allowing thetest-pyqt5job to run on all events. Analysis shows that in the last 30 days, there were 8 push events and 2 pull requests. The additional CI runs from pull requests are minimal and are unlikely to significantly impact CI performance or resource usage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the frequency of pull requests vs. pushes # Get the number of pull requests in the last 30 days pr_count=$(gh pr list --limit 1000 --json createdAt --jq 'map(select(.createdAt >= (now - 30*24*60*60 | todate))) | length') # Get the number of pushes in the last 30 days push_count=$(gh api repos/:owner/:repo/events --jq '[.[] | select(.type == "PushEvent" and (.created_at | fromdateiso8601) >= (now - 30*24*60*60))] | length') echo "Pull Requests in the last 30 days: $pr_count" echo "Pushes in the last 30 days: $push_count"Length of output: 443
.github/workflows/tests.yml (5)
54-54: LGTM! Improved test matrix with newer OS and Python versions.The changes to the
base-testjob configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Adding Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations improves coverage for newer versions.
- Using "windows-latest" ensures testing on the most recent Windows version.
- The new PySide6 configuration on Ubuntu 24.04 expands Qt backend testing.
These updates will help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
Also applies to: 61-63, 65-65, 71-71
105-105: Clarify thebase-test-mainjob trigger and approve OS updates.The OS updates in the
base-test-mainjob look good:
- Including "ubuntu-24.04", "macos-14", and "windows-2022" aligns with the PR objective to use more modern OS versions.
However, there's a potential issue:
- The job condition
if: github.event_name == 'push'has been commented out. This might cause the job to run unintentionally on pull requests.Please clarify if removing this condition is intentional. If not, consider uncommenting the line:
if: github.event_name == 'push'This ensures the job only runs on push events, maintaining the original workflow logic.
Also applies to: 112-112
133-136: LGTM! Refined test matrix with new exclusions.The new exclusions for macOS 14 configurations look good:
- Excluding PySide2 on macOS 14 is reasonable, as it's an older Qt binding.
- Excluding Python 3.9 on macOS 14 helps focus on more recent Python versions.
These exclusions help optimize the test matrix by avoiding less relevant combinations.
To ensure no critical configurations are accidentally excluded, please verify that all necessary Python and Qt backend combinations are still covered in the test matrix for macOS 14.
207-207: LGTM with a minor inconsistency.The updates to the
test_condajob look good:
- Running on Ubuntu 24.04 is consistent with other jobs and aligns with the PR objective.
- Updating the conda environment to use Python 3.12 ensures testing with the latest version.
However, there's a potential inconsistency:
- Line 261 still uses Python 3.11 in the tox command:
conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py311-PySide2-condaConsider updating this to Python 3.12 to match the conda environment:
- conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py311-PySide2-conda + conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-condaPlease verify if this change is intended or if it should be updated to maintain consistency with the Python version specified for the conda environment.
Also applies to: 218-218, 261-261
Line range hint
1-280: Overall, good progress on updating CI configurations.This PR successfully updates the CI configurations to use more modern OS and Python versions, aligning well with the stated objectives. Key improvements include:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 across various jobs.
- Adding support for Python 3.12 and macOS 14.
- Expanding the test matrix with new configurations and exclusions.
A few areas require attention:
- The new
check_pathjob needs refinement to address deprecated syntax and potential shell scripting issues.- The
base-test-mainjob condition needs clarification.- There's a potential inconsistency in the
test_condajob's tox command.Once these points are addressed, the PR will significantly enhance the project's CI pipeline, ensuring better compatibility with modern environments.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
98-98: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:1:31: Quote this to prevent word splitting
(shellcheck)
98-98: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2143:style:1:38: Use grep -q instead of comparing output with [ -n .. ]
(shellcheck)
98-98: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
101-101: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
| @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| fail-fast: false | |||
| matrix: | |||
| qt_backend: ["PyQt5", "PySide2"] | |||
| os: ["ubuntu-22.04"] | |||
| os: ["ubuntu-24.04"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Hardcoded Ubuntu Versions Found in Other CI Configurations
The update to ubuntu-24.04 in .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml is correctly implemented. However, the following files still contain hardcoded Ubuntu versions:
azure-pipelines.ymlUbuntu-24.04Ubuntu-22.04Ubuntu-20.04
.readthedocs.ymlubuntu-22.04
Please update these files to use ubuntu-24.04 to maintain consistency across all CI environments and ensure compatibility with the latest Ubuntu version.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: OS update to Ubuntu 24.04
The change to use ubuntu-24.04 aligns with the PR objective and ensures tests run on the latest LTS version of Ubuntu. This is a good practice for maintaining up-to-date CI environments.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all project dependencies support Ubuntu 24.04. Run the following script to check for any potential issues:
If the script returns any results, review those files to ensure they're compatible with Ubuntu 24.04 or update them accordingly.
The previous script encountered an error due to an unrecognized file type "python". Let's correct the file type to "py" and re-run the check to ensure no hardcoded Ubuntu version dependencies exist.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any hardcoded Ubuntu version dependencies in the project
# Test: Search for any hardcoded Ubuntu version references
rg -i 'ubuntu-\d{2}\.04|ubuntu\s+\d{2}\.04' --type yaml --type python
Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any hardcoded Ubuntu version dependencies in the project
# Test: Search for any hardcoded Ubuntu version references
rg -i 'ubuntu-\d{2}\.04|ubuntu\s+\d{2}\.04' --type yaml --type py
Length of output: 403
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (1)
41-44: LGTM: New parameter adds flexibility, consider adding a descriptionThe addition of the
artifact_suffixparameter is a good improvement, allowing for more flexible artifact naming. This can be particularly useful for distinguishing artifacts from different workflow runs or configurations.Consider adding a brief description for this new parameter using the
descriptionkey. For example:artifact_suffix: required: false type: string default: "" description: "Optional suffix to append to artifact names for easier identification".github/workflows/tests.yml (3)
54-54: LGTM! Expanded test matrix with newer OS and Python versions.The changes to the
base-testjob configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Adding Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations improves coverage for newer versions.
- Using "windows-latest" ensures testing on the most recent Windows version.
These updates will help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind keeping the Ubuntu 20.04 and 22.04 configurations (lines 68-70 and 74-78) to clarify why these older versions are still included in the test matrix.
Also applies to: 61-63, 65-65
193-193: LGTM! Updatedtest_condajob to use newer OS and Python versions.The changes to the
test_condajob configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective of using more modern OS versions.
- Upgrading to Python 3.12 ensures testing with the latest Python version.
These updates are consistent with the changes made in other jobs and will help ensure compatibility with the latest environments.
Consider updating the tox command on line 247 to use Python 3.12 instead of 3.11:
- run: conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py311-PySide2-conda + run: conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-condaThis will ensure that the tox environment matches the Python version specified in the conda setup.
Also applies to: 204-204
Action Required: Remaining references to Ubuntu 20.04 found in workflow files.
The following workflow files still reference
ubuntu-20.04:
.github/workflows/tests.yml
runs-on: ubuntu-20.04os: "ubuntu-20.04"
.github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml
os: "ubuntu-20.04"
.github/workflows/make_release.yml
os: ["ubuntu-20.04", "windows-2019", "macos-13", "macos-14"]Please verify if these references should be updated to a newer Ubuntu version (e.g.,
ubuntu-24.04) or retained for compatibility reasons.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-258: Overall LGTM! CI configuration successfully updated with modern OS and Python versions.The changes in this file successfully achieve the PR objectives:
- Updated various jobs to use Ubuntu 24.04 and Python 3.12.
- Added configurations for newer OS versions (e.g., macOS 14, Windows latest).
- Expanded the test matrix to cover more scenarios (e.g., PySide6 on Ubuntu 24.04).
- Added a new
check-packagejob for improved quality assurance.These updates will enhance the testing environment and ensure compatibility with the latest software versions.
To improve maintainability, consider:
- Adding comments to explain the rationale behind keeping older OS versions in some configurations.
- Creating a separate workflow file for the
check-packagejob if it's intended to be run independently of the main test workflow.To ensure all references to Ubuntu 20.04 have been updated as intended, you can run the following script:
This will help identify any overlooked instances that might need updating.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to Ubuntu 20.04 in workflow files rg 'ubuntu-20\.04' .github/workflows/Length of output: 323
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (3)
12-12: LGTM: Updated to latest Ubuntu LTS versionUpdating the default OS to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective and ensures the CI environment uses the latest LTS release. This change provides access to more recent packages and longer support.
106-106: LGTM: Artifact naming updated consistentlyThe artifact naming for both timing reports and coverage data has been updated to include the new
artifact_suffixparameter. This change is implemented consistently and maintains backward compatibility while allowing for more flexible artifact identification.Also applies to: 115-115
Line range hint
1-118: Overall assessment: Changes improve workflow flexibility and modernize CIThe modifications in this file successfully achieve the PR objectives by updating to a more modern OS version and introducing flexibility in artifact naming. The changes are well-implemented, maintain backward compatibility, and improve the overall CI workflow. No major issues were identified during the review.
.github/workflows/tests.yml (4)
71-71: LGTM! Added PySide6 testing on Ubuntu 24.04.The addition of a PySide6 configuration on Ubuntu 24.04 is a good improvement:
- It expands the Qt backend testing coverage.
- It aligns with the PR objective of using more modern OS versions.
This change will help ensure compatibility with different Qt backends on the latest Ubuntu LTS version.
90-90: Updates tobase-test-mainjob configuration require clarification.The changes to the
base-test-mainjob look good overall:
- Updating the OS list to include newer versions (Ubuntu 24.04, macOS 14, Windows 2022) aligns with the PR objective.
- The new exclusions for macOS 14 help optimize the test matrix.
However, there's a potential issue that needs clarification:
- The condition for triggering the job on push events (line 90) has been commented out. This might affect the continuous integration process for direct pushes to the main branches.
Could you please clarify the intention behind commenting out the push event trigger? If this was unintentional, consider uncommenting the line:
- # if: github.event_name == 'push' + if: github.event_name == 'push'If it was intentional, please explain the reasoning to ensure everyone understands the change in the CI process.
Also applies to: 97-97, 118-121
128-128: LGTM! Added artifact suffix for better organization.The addition of
artifact_suffix: "-main"is a good improvement:
- It helps distinguish artifacts from different workflow runs.
- This change improves the organization and identification of build artifacts.
This small addition will make it easier to manage and locate specific artifacts from the main workflow.
Line range hint
250-258: LGTM! Addedcheck-packagejob for improved quality assurance.The addition of the
check-packagejob is an excellent improvement to the workflow:
- It builds and inspects the package, ensuring the integrity of the built artifact.
- The job uses the reliable
hynek/build-and-inspect-python-package@v2action.- This addition enhances the overall quality assurance process of the project.
This new job will help catch potential packaging issues early in the development process, improving the reliability of releases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (2)
419-424: LGTM with suggestion: CustomSaveDialog with class testThe test correctly initializes the CustomSaveDialog with a class (SaveProject) and checks for the absence of 'stack_widget'. While this is good, consider enhancing the test to check more properties of the dialog, similar to the load dialog test.
Consider adding assertions for:
- The dialog's acceptMode
- The selected filter
- Any other relevant properties specific to saving with a class
This will make the test more comprehensive and robust.
425-429: LGTM with suggestion: CustomSaveDialog with no system widget testThe test correctly initializes the CustomSaveDialog with a dictionary and system_widget set to False, then checks for the presence of 'stack_widget'. This is good for testing this specific configuration.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the significance of the 'stack_widget' and why it's present when system_widget is False. This will make the test's purpose clearer to other developers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (2)
397-401: LGTM: CustomLoadDialog initialization test looks goodThe test correctly initializes the CustomLoadDialog with a dictionary and checks its acceptMode. This ensures that the dialog is set up properly for loading operations.
403-411: LGTM: Comprehensive test for CustomLoadDialog with classThis test thoroughly checks the CustomLoadDialog initialization with a class (LoadProject). It verifies the correct acceptMode, load_class, selected_filter, and load_location, ensuring that the dialog is properly configured for class-based loading operations.
| def test_create_save_dialog_with_dict(qtbot): | ||
| dialog = CustomSaveDialog(save_dict, history=["/aaa/"]) | ||
| assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomSaveDialog.AcceptSave | ||
| qtbot.addWidget(dialog) | ||
| assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomSaveDialog.AcceptModeAcceptSave | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in CustomSaveDialog acceptMode assertion
There's a small typo in the assertion for the CustomSaveDialog's acceptMode. The correct enum should be CustomSaveDialog.AcceptMode.AcceptSave.
Please update the assertion as follows:
- assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomSaveDialog.AcceptModeAcceptSave
+ assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomSaveDialog.AcceptMode.AcceptSave📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def test_create_save_dialog_with_dict(qtbot): | |
| dialog = CustomSaveDialog(save_dict, history=["/aaa/"]) | |
| assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomSaveDialog.AcceptSave | |
| qtbot.addWidget(dialog) | |
| assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomSaveDialog.AcceptModeAcceptSave | |
| def test_create_save_dialog_with_dict(qtbot): | |
| dialog = CustomSaveDialog(save_dict, history=["/aaa/"]) | |
| qtbot.addWidget(dialog) | |
| assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomSaveDialog.AcceptMode.AcceptSave |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (1)
419-424: LGTM with suggestion: Consider expanding CustomSaveDialog with class testThe test correctly creates a CustomSaveDialog with a class (SaveProject) and checks for the absence of a 'stack_widget' attribute. However, the test could be more comprehensive.
Consider adding assertions for:
- The dialog's acceptMode (similar to the load dialog test).
- The result.save_class (to ensure it's set to SaveProject).
- The selected_filter (to match SaveProject's name with suffix).
These additions would make the test more robust and consistent with the load dialog test.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (4)
397-401: LGTM: CustomLoadDialog creation with dict tested correctlyThe test function correctly creates a CustomLoadDialog with a dictionary and verifies the acceptMode. The implementation is straightforward and effective.
403-412: LGTM: CustomLoadDialog creation with class tested comprehensivelyThe test function thoroughly checks the creation of a CustomLoadDialog with a class (LoadProject). It verifies the acceptMode, result.load_class, selected_filter, and load_location, covering all essential aspects of the dialog's initialization.
413-417: LGTM: CustomSaveDialog creation with dict tested correctlyThe test function correctly creates a CustomSaveDialog with a dictionary and verifies the acceptMode. The implementation is straightforward and effective, mirroring the structure of the load dialog test.
425-429: LGTM: CustomSaveDialog creation without system widget tested correctlyThe test function effectively checks the creation of a CustomSaveDialog with system_widget set to False. It correctly verifies the presence of the 'stack_widget' attribute, which is the key difference when system_widget is disabled.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (3)
397-425: Consider enhancing test coverage and assertions in TestCustomDialogThe TestCustomDialog class provides good coverage for different scenarios of CustomLoadDialog and CustomSaveDialog. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add more assertions to verify the state of the dialog objects, such as checking the default values of other properties.
- Test error handling scenarios, such as invalid input or edge cases.
- Consider using parameterized tests to reduce code duplication for similar test cases.
437-481: Enhance TestPSaveDialog with more comprehensive assertions and error handlingThe TestPSaveDialog class provides good coverage for different scenarios of PSaveDialog. To further improve the tests, consider:
- Add more assertions to verify the state of the dialog objects, such as checking the default values of other properties.
- Test error handling scenarios, such as invalid input or edge cases.
- Consider using parameterized tests for similar test cases to reduce code duplication.
- Add tests for user interactions, such as changing the selected directory or canceling the dialog.
Line range hint
1-490: Consider reorganizing the test file for better maintainabilityWhile the new test classes (TestCustomDialog and TestPSaveDialog) are well-structured, the overall organization of the test file could be improved:
- Group related test classes and functions together.
- Consider splitting the file into multiple files based on the components being tested.
- Add more comments or docstrings to explain the purpose of each test class or group of tests.
- Ensure consistent naming conventions for test classes and methods throughout the file.
These changes would improve the maintainability and readability of the test suite.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (1)
Line range hint
1-490: Overall, good addition of new test classes with room for improvementThe addition of TestCustomDialog and TestPSaveDialog classes enhances the test coverage for the common GUI components. These new tests provide valuable validation for different scenarios of the CustomLoadDialog, CustomSaveDialog, and PSaveDialog classes.
While the new tests are well-structured, there are opportunities to improve:
- Enhance assertions and error handling in both new test classes.
- Consider using parameterized tests to reduce code duplication.
- Improve the overall organization of the test file for better maintainability.
These improvements would further strengthen the test suite and make it more robust and easier to maintain in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (3)
397-425: New TestCustomDialog class looks good, but consider adding more assertionsThe TestCustomDialog class is a good addition to test the CustomLoadDialog and CustomSaveDialog classes. The tests cover basic functionality such as creation, acceptance mode, and result retrieval. However, there are a few suggestions to improve test coverage:
- In the
test_create_load_with_classmethod, consider adding assertions for other properties of the result, such asresult.selected_filterandresult.load_location.- In the
test_create_save_with_classmethod, add assertions to check the properties of the dialog, similar to the load dialog tests.- Consider adding tests for edge cases or different initialization parameters.
Here's an example of how you could enhance the
test_create_load_with_classmethod:def test_create_load_with_class(self, qtbot): dialog = CustomLoadDialog(LoadProject, history=["/aaa/"]) qtbot.addWidget(dialog) assert dialog.acceptMode() == CustomLoadDialog.AcceptMode.AcceptOpen result = dialog.get_result() assert result.load_class is LoadProject assert result.selected_filter == LoadProject.get_name_with_suffix() assert result.load_location == [] assert dialog.history() == ["/aaa/"]
437-483: TestPSaveDialog class is well-structured, but consider improving test isolationThe TestPSaveDialog class provides good coverage for the PSaveDialog functionality. It tests various scenarios such as creation with different settings, handling of default directories, and file selection. However, there are a few suggestions to improve the tests:
Test Isolation: The tests are modifying the global
part_settingsobject, which could lead to interdependencies between tests. Consider using a freshpart_settingsobject for each test, perhaps by using a fixture.Mocking: The tests are using monkeypatch to mock some behaviors. While this is generally good, consider using more explicit mocks for better clarity and control over the test environment.
Assertions: Some tests could benefit from more explicit assertions, especially regarding the state of the dialog after certain actions.
Here's an example of how you could improve the
test_selection_tiff_filemethod:def test_selection_tiff_file(self, part_settings, tmp_path, qtbot, monkeypatch): part_settings.set("io.filter_save", SaveAsTiff.get_name()) monkeypatch.setattr(QFileDialog, "result", lambda x: QFileDialog.Accepted) monkeypatch.setattr(QFileDialog, "selectedFiles", lambda x: [str(tmp_path / "test.tif")]) dialog = PSaveDialog( save_dict, settings=part_settings, path="io.test4", filter_path="io.filter_save", system_widget=False ) qtbot.addWidget(dialog) assert SaveAsTiff.get_name() in dialog.nameFilters() assert dialog.directory().path() == str(tmp_path) dialog.accept() assert dialog.result() == QFileDialog.Accepted assert dialog.selectedNameFilter() == SaveAsTiff.get_name() assert dialog.selectedFiles() == [str(tmp_path / "test.tif")] assert part_settings.get_path_history() == [str(tmp_path), str(Path.home())]This version adds more explicit assertions and removes the need for showing and hiding the dialog, which isn't necessary for unit tests.
Line range hint
1-1000: Comprehensive test coverage, but consider modularizingThe test file
test_common_gui.pyprovides extensive coverage for various GUI components of the PartSeg application. It includes tests for dialogs, widgets, and utility functions. This comprehensive approach is commendable as it helps ensure the reliability and correctness of the GUI elements.However, given the length and complexity of this test file, consider the following suggestions:
Modularization: The file is quite long and contains tests for many different components. Consider splitting it into multiple files, each focusing on a specific group of related components. This would improve maintainability and readability.
Use of Fixtures: While some tests use fixtures, expanding their use could help reduce code duplication and improve test setup consistency.
Naming Conventions: Ensure all test methods follow a consistent naming convention, preferably starting with
test_to be automatically discovered by pytest.Documentation: Consider adding docstrings to test classes and methods to explain the purpose of each test, especially for complex scenarios.
To implement these suggestions, you could:
- Create separate test files for major components, e.g.,
test_dialogs.py,test_widgets.py, etc.- Implement more fixtures in a
conftest.pyfile for commonly used objects.- Review and standardize the naming of all test methods.
- Add brief docstrings to test classes and methods explaining their purpose.
This refactoring would make the test suite more manageable as the project grows.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (6 hunks)
- package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (3)
Line range hint
3-4: LGTM: Addition ofcache_dirparameterThe introduction of the
cache_dirparameter is a good improvement. It allows for more flexible control over the caching directory, which can help optimize the CI/CD pipeline performance.
11-11: Verify constraints file for Python 3.12The update of the constraints file from
constraints_py3.11.txttoconstraints_py3.12.txtis consistent with the Python version update.Please ensure that the
constraints_py3.12.txtfile exists and contains the correct dependencies for Python 3.12. Run the following script to verify:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify constraints file for Python 3.12 # Test: Check if the constraints file exists if [ -f "requirements/constraints_py3.12.txt" ]; then echo "constraints_py3.12.txt exists" # Test: Display the content of the constraints file cat requirements/constraints_py3.12.txt else echo "Error: constraints_py3.12.txt does not exist" fi # Test: Compare with the previous constraints file to highlight changes if [ -f "requirements/constraints_py3.11.txt" ]; then echo "Differences between constraints_py3.11.txt and constraints_py3.12.txt:" diff requirements/constraints_py3.11.txt requirements/constraints_py3.12.txt || true else echo "Note: constraints_py3.11.txt does not exist for comparison" fiAlso applies to: 16-16
8-8: Verify compatibility with Python 3.12The update to Python 3.12 aligns with the PR objective. This is a good step towards using more modern Python versions.
To ensure smooth transition, please verify that all dependencies and code are compatible with Python 3.12. Run the following script to check for any potential compatibility issues:
✅ Verification successful
Python 3.12 Compatibility Verified
The constraints for Python 3.12 have been successfully updated, and all dependencies are compatible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Python 3.12 compatibility issues # Test: Search for deprecated features or syntax that might not work in Python 3.12 rg -i '(async def.*\*|yield from|@asyncio\.coroutine|imp\.|cgi\.|cgitb\.|distutils\.)' --type py # Test: Check if all dependencies in requirements files support Python 3.12 for req_file in $(fd -e txt -e in requirements); do echo "Checking $req_file" grep -vE '^#' "$req_file" | xargs -I {} sh -c 'pip install --dry-run "{}" && pip check "{}"' || echo "Potential issue with {}" doneLength of output: 10966
.github/workflows/tests.yml (7)
54-54: LGTM! Improved test matrix with newer OS and Python versions.The changes to the
base-testjob configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Adding Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations improves coverage for newer versions.
- Using "windows-latest" ensures testing on the most recent Windows version.
- The new PySide6 configuration on Ubuntu 24.04 expands Qt backend testing.
These updates will help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
Also applies to: 61-63, 65-65, 71-71
90-90: Verify the intended trigger forbase-test-mainjob.The changes to the
base-test-mainjob look good overall:
- The OS matrix has been updated to include newer versions, which aligns with the PR objectives.
- New exclusions for macOS 14 have been added, which helps to optimize the test matrix.
However, there's one point that needs attention:
- The condition for triggering on push events (line 90) has been commented out. This might affect when this job runs.
Please confirm if commenting out the push event trigger was intentional. If not, consider uncommenting it to ensure the job runs as expected on push events.
Also applies to: 97-97, 118-121
Line range hint
137-137: LGTM! Updated Python version for coverage testing.Updating the Python version to 3.12 for the
test_coveragejob is a good change. It ensures that code coverage is tested with the latest Python version, aligning with the overall updates in this PR.
128-129: LGTM with a question about the artifact suffix.The changes to the
coverage_preparejob look good:
- Adding verbose mode to tox arguments will provide more detailed output during testing.
- The new artifact suffix "-main" has been added, which might be used to distinguish coverage reports.
Could you please clarify the purpose of the new artifact suffix "-main"? Is it used to differentiate coverage reports from different workflows or branches?
194-194: LGTM with a minor inconsistency.The updates to the
test_condajob look good:
- Running on Ubuntu 24.04 is consistent with other jobs and aligns with the PR objective.
- Updating the conda environment to use Python 3.12 ensures testing with the latest version.
However, there's a potential inconsistency:
- Line 248 still uses Python 3.11 in the tox command:
conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-condaConsider updating this to Python 3.12 to match the conda environment:
- conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-conda + conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-condaPlease verify if this change is intended or if it should be updated to maintain consistency with the Python version specified for the conda environment.
Also applies to: 205-205, 248-248
Line range hint
252-261: Great addition! New job to verify package build.The new
check-packagejob is an excellent addition to the workflow:
- It builds and inspects the Python package using a well-maintained action.
- This step can help catch packaging issues early in the CI process.
- It adds an extra layer of quality assurance to the project.
This job will help ensure that the package is always in a releasable state and follows best practices for Python packaging.
Line range hint
1-261: Overall, excellent updates to modernize the CI workflow!The changes in this file significantly improve the CI process:
- Updated OS versions across multiple jobs, now using Ubuntu 24.04, macOS 14, and the latest Windows.
- Upgraded Python versions, including the addition of Python 3.12 in various configurations.
- Expanded test matrix with new Qt backend configurations (PyQt6, PySide6).
- Added a new
check-packagejob to verify the package build process.These updates ensure broader compatibility testing and align well with the PR objectives. The workflow now covers a more comprehensive range of environments and scenarios, which will help maintain the project's quality and reliability.
To finalize this review:
- Confirm the intentional commenting out of the push event trigger for the
base-test-mainjob.- Clarify the purpose of the new "-main" artifact suffix in the
coverage_preparejob.- Verify the Python version consistency in the
test_condajob's tox command.Once these points are addressed, the workflow will be in excellent shape to support the project's CI needs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-261: Overall LGTM with a suggestion for further modernization.The changes in this file successfully update many job configurations to use more modern OS and Python versions, aligning with the PR's objective. The addition of the
check-packagejob enhances the CI pipeline's capabilities.However, there are still some instances of older OS versions being used (e.g., ubuntu-20.04, ubuntu-22.04). While this might be intentional for backward compatibility, consider:
- Evaluating if these older versions are still necessary for your project's requirements.
- If possible, transitioning fully to ubuntu-24.04 across all jobs for consistency and to fully leverage the benefits of the latest Ubuntu version.
This full transition would further streamline your CI process and ensure testing on the most up-to-date environments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (5 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (6 hunks)
- package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (6)
54-54: LGTM! Expanded test matrix with newer OS and Python versions.The changes to the
base-testjob configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Adding Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations improves coverage for newer versions.
- Using "windows-latest" ensures testing on the most recent Windows version.
- The new PySide6 configuration on Ubuntu 24.04 expands Qt backend testing.
These updates will help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
Also applies to: 61-63, 65-65, 71-71
90-90: LGTM with a query on job triggering.The updates to the
base-test-mainjob look good:
- The OS matrix now includes more modern versions (ubuntu-24.04, macos-14, windows-2022).
- New exclusions for macOS 14 configurations help optimize the test matrix.
However, could you clarify why the condition for triggering on push events (line 90) has been commented out? This change might affect when this job runs.
Also applies to: 97-97, 118-121
128-129: LGTM! Enhanced job configuration with useful parameters.The new inputs for the
base-test-mainjob are beneficial:
artifact_suffix: "-main"allows for unique artifact naming, which is useful for distinguishing artifacts from different workflow runs.pytest_args: "-v"enables more verbose pytest output, which can be helpful for debugging and understanding test results.These additions improve the flexibility and debuggability of the workflow.
Line range hint
138-138: LGTM! Updated coverage testing to latest Python version.Updating the
test_coveragejob to use Python 3.12 is a good move. It ensures that code coverage is tested with the latest Python version, aligning with the PR's objective of modernizing the testing environment.
194-194: LGTM with a minor inconsistency.The updates to the
test_condajob look good:
- Running on Ubuntu 24.04 is consistent with other jobs and aligns with the PR objective.
- Updating the conda environment to use Python 3.12 ensures testing with the latest version.
However, there's a potential inconsistency:
- Line 248 still uses PySide2 in the tox command:
conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-condaConsider updating this to PyQt6 or PySide6 to match the more modern Python version:
- conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PySide2-conda + conda run -n test --no-capture-output tox -e py312-PyQt6-condaPlease verify if this change is intended or if it should be updated to maintain consistency with the Python version specified for the conda environment.
Also applies to: 205-205, 248-248
Line range hint
252-261: LGTM! Excellent addition of package build and inspection job.The new
check-packagejob is a valuable addition to the CI pipeline:
- It verifies the package build process, which can catch issues early in the development cycle.
- The use of
hynek/build-and-inspect-python-package@v2action ensures a thorough inspection of the built package.- Running on the latest Ubuntu version is consistent with the PR's objective of using modern environments.
This job will help maintain the quality and integrity of the package distribution process.
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (3)
397-425: LGTM! Well-structured tests for CustomLoadDialog and CustomSaveDialogThe TestCustomDialog class contains comprehensive tests covering various scenarios for both CustomLoadDialog and CustomSaveDialog. The tests are well-organized, use qtbot appropriately for widget handling, and cover important aspects such as creation, acceptance mode, and result retrieval.
437-483: LGTM! Comprehensive tests for PSaveDialogThe TestPSaveDialog class provides a thorough set of tests covering various aspects of the PSaveDialog, including creation with different settings, directory handling, and file selection. The use of monkeypatching to simulate different behaviors is appropriate and enhances the test coverage.
Line range hint
485-1879: LGTM! Comprehensive test suite covering various componentsThe remaining code in the file presents a well-structured and comprehensive test suite covering a wide range of components, including widgets, dialogs, and utility functions. The tests make good use of pytest fixtures and monkeypatching to create appropriate testing scenarios. The coverage appears to be thorough, and there are no apparent issues with the implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
.github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (6)
17-20: Approve new input parameters and suggest documentation update.The addition of
pytest_argsandartifact_suffixinput parameters enhances the workflow's flexibility. These optional parameters allow for more customized test runs and artifact naming.Consider updating the workflow documentation to explain the usage and benefits of these new parameters. This will help other developers understand how to leverage these new features effectively.
Also applies to: 45-48
96-104: Approve PartSegImage test step and suggest minor improvement.The addition of a separate step for testing PartSegImage enhances the granularity of the test suite. The use of conditional execution and environment variables provides good control over the test environment.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
PYVISTA_OFF_SCREENenvironment variable for better maintainability. For example:env: PYVISTA_OFF_SCREEN: True # Enables off-screen rendering for PyVista, necessary for headless environments
105-113: Approve PartSegCore test step and suggest potential optimization.The addition of a separate step for testing PartSegCore is consistent with the PartSegImage test step and enhances the test suite's structure.
Consider extracting the common environment variables into a reusable YAML anchor to reduce duplication. For example:
env: &common_env PYVISTA_OFF_SCREEN: True BACKEND: ${{ inputs.qt_backend }} PIP_CONSTRAINT: ${{ inputs.napari == 'latest' && format('requirements/constraints_py{0}{1}.txt', inputs.python_version, inputs.pydantic ) || '' }} UV_CONSTRAINT: ${{ inputs.napari == 'latest' && format('requirements/constraints_py{0}{1}.txt', inputs.python_version, inputs.pydantic ) || '' }} # Then in each step: env: <<: *common_envThis would make the workflow more maintainable and less prone to inconsistencies.
114-125: Approve PartSeg test step and suggest error handling improvement.The addition of a separate step for testing PartSeg, using a headless GUI action, is appropriate for GUI testing in a CI environment. The inclusion of a timeout is a good practice to prevent hung tests.
Consider adding error handling and logging for better debugging in case of test failures. You could use the
continue-on-erroroption and a post-step to handle and report errors. For example:- name: Test with tox PartSeg if: ${{ inputs.napari == 'all' }} uses: aganders3/headless-gui@v2 continue-on-error: true id: partseg_test timeout-minutes: ${{ inputs.timeout }} with: run: python -m tox ${{ inputs.tox_args }} -- package/tests/test_PartSeg ${{ inputs.pytest_args }} env: # ... (your existing env variables) - name: Handle PartSeg test failure if: ${{ failure() && steps.partseg_test.outcome == 'failure' }} run: | echo "PartSeg tests failed. Check the logs for more information." # Add any additional error handling or logging hereThis approach would allow the workflow to continue even if the PartSeg tests fail, while still providing visibility into the failure.
126-139: Approve "Test with tox all" step changes and suggest clarity improvement.The modifications to the "Test with tox all" step complement the new specific test steps well. The addition of
pytest_argsto the tox command enhances flexibility in test configurations.To improve clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this step in relation to the new specific test steps. For example:
- name: Test with tox all # This step runs when not doing a comprehensive test of all components if: ${{ inputs.napari != 'all' }} uses: aganders3/headless-gui@v2 timeout-minutes: ${{ inputs.timeout }} with: run: python -m tox ${{ inputs.tox_args }} -- ${{ inputs.pytest_args }} # ... (rest of the step)This comment would help other developers understand the workflow structure more easily.
Line range hint
139-154: Approve artifact upload changes and suggest artifact management improvement.The addition of
artifact_suffixto the artifact names enhances flexibility in artifact management and aligns well with the new input parameter.To further improve artifact management, consider implementing a cleanup step for old artifacts. This can help manage storage and keep the artifact list clean. You could use a separate workflow or add a step to this workflow. For example:
- name: Delete old artifacts uses: actions/github-script@v6 with: script: | const ms_per_day = 86400000 const days_to_keep = 7 const repo = context.repo const artifacts = await github.rest.actions.listArtifactsForRepo({ owner: repo.owner, repo: repo.repo, }) for (const artifact of artifacts.data.artifacts) { const created = new Date(artifact.created_at).getTime() const now = new Date().getTime() if (now - created > days_to_keep * ms_per_day) { console.log('Deleting artifact', artifact.name) await github.rest.actions.deleteArtifact({ owner: repo.owner, repo: repo.repo, artifact_id: artifact.id, }) } }This script would delete artifacts older than 7 days, helping to manage storage and keep your artifact list tidy.
.github/workflows/tests.yml (3)
128-129: LGTM! Enhanced output configuration forbase-test-mainjob.The additions to the
base-test-mainjob outputs are good:
- The artifact suffix will help distinguish outputs from different job runs.
- Specifying verbose pytest arguments will provide more detailed test output.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the "-main" suffix for better clarity in the workflow file.
248-248: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The update to the tox command for conda testing looks good:
- Using Python 3.12 is consistent with other changes in the workflow.
- Testing with PySide2 provides coverage for a different Qt backend.
Consider adding a matrix strategy for the conda job to test multiple Qt backends (e.g., PyQt5, PyQt6, PySide2, PySide6) with Python 3.12. This would provide more comprehensive coverage of different conda environments.
Line range hint
252-261: Great addition of package inspection job!The new
check-packagejob is a valuable addition to the workflow:
- It verifies the package build process, which is crucial for ensuring the project can be properly distributed.
- Using the
hynek/build-and-inspect-python-package@v2action is a good choice for this task.Consider adding a step to upload the build artifacts for potential manual inspection or use in subsequent jobs. You can use the
actions/upload-artifactaction for this purpose.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/base_test_workflow.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-154: Overall assessment: Approve changes with minor suggestions.The modifications to the
base_test_workflow.ymlfile successfully update the CI configuration to use Ubuntu 24.04 and provide more flexibility in testing. The changes align well with the PR objectives and improve the overall structure of the workflow.Key improvements include:
- Updated OS version
- Added flexibility with new input parameters
- Enhanced granularity in test steps
- Improved artifact naming
The suggestions provided aim to further enhance maintainability, error handling, and artifact management. Consider implementing these suggestions to maximize the benefits of these changes.
12-12: Approve OS update and suggest compatibility check.The update to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective to use more modern OS versions. This change provides access to newer packages and longer support.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all dependencies and build processes work correctly with Ubuntu 24.04. Run the following command to check the Ubuntu version in the CI environment:
.github/workflows/tests.yml (3)
54-54: LGTM! Expanded test matrix with newer OS and Python versions.The changes to the
base-testjob configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Adding Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations improves coverage for newer versions.
- Using "windows-latest" ensures testing on the most recent Windows version.
- The new PySide6 configuration on Ubuntu 24.04 expands Qt backend testing.
These updates will help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
Also applies to: 61-63, 65-65, 71-71
90-90: Verify intended behavior forbase-test-mainjob.The changes to the
base-test-mainjob configuration raise a few points:
- The condition for triggering on push events is commented out (line 90). Is this intentional? It may affect when this job runs.
- The OS matrix update to include newer versions is good and aligns with the PR objective.
- New exclusions have been added for macOS 14 configurations. Please confirm if these limitations are intentional and necessary.
Could you clarify the reasoning behind these changes, especially the commented-out condition and the new exclusions for macOS 14?
Also applies to: 97-97, 118-121
Line range hint
137-138: LGTM! Updated coverage testing to Python 3.12.The changes to the
test_coveragejob are appropriate:
- Updating to Python 3.12 aligns with the overall workflow updates.
- The tox environment has been correctly updated to match the new Python version.
These changes ensure that coverage testing is performed using the latest Python version.
| @@ -182,7 +191,7 @@ jobs: | |||
|
|
|||
| test_conda: | |||
| name: Test PartSeg conda | |||
| runs-on: ubuntu-20.04 | |||
| runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing environment.yml File
The environment.yml file is not found in the repository. Please ensure it is added or properly generated to support Python 3.12.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Updated conda testing environment.
The changes to the test_conda job are good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Using Python 3.12 ensures testing with the latest version.
Please ensure that all conda-related commands and environment files have been updated to support Python 3.12. You may want to run the following script to verify:
Also applies to: 205-205
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify conda environment setup for Python 3.12
# Check if environment.yml file exists and contains Python 3.12
if [ -f environment.yml ]; then
if grep -q "python=3.12" environment.yml; then
echo "environment.yml file is correctly configured for Python 3.12"
else
echo "Warning: environment.yml may need to be updated for Python 3.12"
fi
else
echo "Warning: environment.yml file not found"
fi
# Check if create_environment_yml.sh script is updated
if grep -q "python=3.12" build_utils/create_environment_yml.sh; then
echo "create_environment_yml.sh script is correctly configured for Python 3.12"
else
echo "Warning: create_environment_yml.sh may need to be updated for Python 3.12"
fi
Length of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all environment.yml files in the repository
fd environment.yml
Length of output: 58
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package/PartSeg/common_gui/custom_load_dialog.py (1)
Line range hint
113-151: Review of the newSelectDirectoryDialogclass implementationThe
SelectDirectoryDialogclass extendsQFileDialogto facilitate directory selection while integrating with the application's settings. The implementation is generally sound, but please consider the following points:
Error Handling in
acceptMethodIn the
acceptmethod, you accessself.selectedFiles()[0]without checking if any files are selected. If the user cancels the dialog or no directory is selected, this could raise anIndexError. Consider adding a check to ensure thatself.selectedFiles()is not empty before accessing the first element.Apply this diff to handle the potential error:
def accept(self) -> None: super().accept() if self.result() != QFileDialog.DialogCode.Accepted: return + if not self.selectedFiles(): + return directory = self.selectedFiles()[0] self.settings.add_path_history(directory) self.settings.set(self.path_in_dict, directory)Clarify
settings_pathHandlingWhen
settings_pathis a list, the__init__method uses the last valid directory from the provided paths but setsself.path_in_dictto the first element ofsettings_path. Ensure that this is the intended behavior. If the goal is to update multiple settings paths or there's a specific reason for this order, please add comments to clarify.Consistent Use of Defaults
In the
__init__method,default_directoryis set to the user's home directory if not provided. Ensure that this default aligns with user expectations and application standards. If a different default directory is more appropriate for the application's context, consider updating it accordingly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- package/PartSeg/common_gui/custom_load_dialog.py (1 hunks)
- package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (26)
package/tests/test_PartSeg/test_common_gui.py (24)
397-400: LGTM: Test for creating CustomLoadDialog with dictThe test correctly checks the creation of CustomLoadDialog with a dictionary and verifies the AcceptMode.
403-411: LGTM: Test for creating CustomLoadDialog with classThis test thoroughly checks the creation of CustomLoadDialog with a class, verifying AcceptMode, result properties, and default values.
412-415: LGTM: Test for creating CustomSaveDialog with dictThe test correctly verifies the creation of CustomSaveDialog with a dictionary and checks the AcceptMode.
417-420: LGTM: Test for creating CustomSaveDialog with classThis test checks the creation of CustomSaveDialog with a class and verifies that it doesn't have a stack_widget attribute.
422-425: LGTM: Test for creating CustomSaveDialog with dict and no system widgetThe test verifies the creation of CustomSaveDialog with a dictionary, no system widget, and checks for the presence of the stack_widget attribute.
437-444: LGTM: Test for PSaveDialog creationThis test correctly verifies the creation of PSaveDialog and checks if the default directory is set to the home directory.
446-450: LGTM: Test for PSaveDialog creation with default directoryThe test properly checks the creation of PSaveDialog with a specified default directory.
452-457: LGTM: Test for PSaveDialog reading path from settingsThis test verifies that PSaveDialog correctly reads the path from settings when initializing.
459-469: LGTM: Test for PSaveDialog reject with no history updateThe test checks that rejecting the dialog doesn't update the path history.
470-483: LGTM: Test for PSaveDialog file selectionThis comprehensive test verifies the file selection process in PSaveDialog, including filter selection and path history updates.
Line range hint
485-496: LGTM: Test for FormDialogThis test correctly verifies the creation and value manipulation of FormDialog.
Line range hint
498-532: LGTM: Test for PLoadDialogThis comprehensive test covers various scenarios for PLoadDialog, including directory selection, path reading from settings, and file selection.
Line range hint
536-548: LGTM: Test for str_filter_saveThis test verifies the string filter functionality for PSaveDialog.
Line range hint
550-566: LGTM: Test for str_filter_loadThis test checks the string filter functionality for PLoadDialog.
Line range hint
568-586: LGTM: Test for recent filesThis test verifies the functionality of LoadRecentFiles, including file list population and size persistence.
Line range hint
588-679: LGTM: TestMultipleFileWidget classThis test class thoroughly checks the functionality of MultipleFileWidget, including file loading, recent file handling, and UI updates.
Line range hint
681-726: LGTM: TestBaseMainWindow classThis test class verifies the basic functionality of BaseMainWindow, including recent file handling and menu actions.
Line range hint
728-775: LGTM: TestQtPopup classThis test class checks various aspects of QtPopup, including positioning and key event handling.
Line range hint
777-781: LGTM: Test for IOMethodMockThis test verifies the functionality of IOMethodMock for various SaveBase functions.
Line range hint
783-786: LGTM: Test for AboutDialog creationThis simple test checks the creation of AboutDialog.
Line range hint
788-803: LGTM: TestAdvancedWindow classThis test class verifies the creation of AdvancedWindow with and without the develop flag.
Line range hint
805-855: LGTM: TestAppearance classThis test class thoroughly checks various aspects of the Appearance class, including zoom factor, rendering selection, and theme selection.
Line range hint
857-893: LGTM: TestFormWidget classThis comprehensive test class verifies the functionality of FormWidget, including creation with different field types and handling of BaseModel fields.
Line range hint
895-1007: LGTM: Remaining test classes and functionsThe remaining test classes and functions cover various utility functions and smaller components, including image adjustment, collapsible widgets, and exception handling. All tests appear to be well-written and comprehensive.
package/PartSeg/common_gui/custom_load_dialog.py (2)
25-26: Addition of__fields__class variable inIOMethodMockThe inclusion of
__fields__: typing.ClassVar[dict[str, typing.Any]] = {}enhances theIOMethodMockclass by adding a class variable to hold field definitions. This aligns with standard practices for mock implementations and should facilitate better type hinting and compatibility with code expecting this attribute.
30-32: Implementation of__call__method returningselfinIOMethodMockThe addition of the
__call__method allows instances ofIOMethodMockto be callable, returning the instance itself upon invocation. This design enables the mock object to mimic callable entities, which can be beneficial in testing scenarios. Ensure that this behavior is intentional and that it integrates seamlessly with parts of the codebase that expect a callable returning an appropriate object.Run the following script to confirm that
IOMethodMockinstances are used as callables in the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Verification of
IOMethodMockCallabilityThe
__call__method inIOMethodMockis intentionally implemented and correctly used as a callable withintest_common_gui.py.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all instances where `IOMethodMock` instances are called. # Expectation: Identify usages of `IOMethodMock` where it is invoked as a function. rg 'IOMethodMock\(.*\)\('Length of output: 124
This reverts commit 3b0cc0b.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (3)
54-54: LGTM! Expanded test matrix with newer OS and Python versions.The changes to the
base-testjob configuration look good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Adding Python 3.12 and macOS 14 configurations improves coverage for newer versions.
- Using "windows-latest" ensures testing on the most recent Windows version.
- The new PySide6 configuration on Ubuntu 24.04 expands Qt backend testing.
These updates will help ensure the project's compatibility with newer environments.
Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind keeping the Ubuntu 20.04 and 22.04 configurations, as it may not be immediately clear why these older versions are still included alongside the newer ones.
Also applies to: 61-63, 65-65, 71-71
128-129: LGTM! Enhanced main branch testing configuration.The additions to the
base-test-mainjob are beneficial:
- The artifact suffix "-main" helps distinguish artifacts from different workflow runs.
- The verbose pytest output (
-v) provides more detailed test results, which can be helpful for debugging.These changes will improve the clarity and informativeness of the main branch testing process.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of these additions, especially the artifact suffix, to make it clear for future maintainers why these parameters are specific to the main branch testing.
Line range hint
251-258: LGTM! Added package build and inspection job.The addition of the
check-packagejob is a valuable improvement to the CI workflow:
- It helps verify that the package can be built correctly.
- The
hynek/build-and-inspect-python-package@v2action provides a comprehensive check of the package structure and metadata.- This step can catch packaging issues early, before they affect releases or deployments.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and importance of this job for future maintainers. Additionally, you might want to specify any particular aspects of the package that should be inspected or validated during this step.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tests.yml (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/test_napari_widgets.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (3)
97-97: LGTM! Updated OS matrix for main branch testing.The changes to the
base-test-mainjob configuration are good:
- Updating the OS matrix to include newer versions (Ubuntu 24.04, macOS 14, Windows 2022) aligns with the PR objective.
- The matrix strategy now covers a wider range of modern environments for thorough testing.
Could you please clarify the rationale behind the new exclusions for macOS 14? Specifically:
- Why is PySide2 excluded for macOS 14?
- Why is Python 3.9 excluded for macOS 14?
This information would be helpful for understanding the testing strategy and could be added as a comment in the workflow file for future reference.
Also applies to: 118-121
Line range hint
137-137: LGTM! Updated coverage test to Python 3.12.Updating the
test_coveragejob to use Python 3.12 is a good change:
- It aligns with the overall objective of using more modern Python versions.
- It ensures that code coverage is tested with the latest supported Python version.
This update helps maintain consistency with the other testing environments and keeps the coverage analysis up-to-date.
194-194: LGTM! Updated conda testing environment.The changes to the
test_condajob are good:
- Updating to Ubuntu 24.04 aligns with the PR objective.
- Using Python 3.12 ensures testing with the latest version.
- The tox environment has been correctly updated to match the new Python version.
These updates will help ensure that the conda environment works correctly with the latest OS and Python versions.
To ensure full compatibility, please verify that all conda-related commands and environment files have been updated to support Python 3.12. You can run the following script to check:
Also applies to: 205-205, 248-248
|
@coderabbitai summary |
✅ Actions performedSummary regeneration triggered. |
Summary by Sourcery
Update CI configurations to use Ubuntu 24.04 and Python 3.12, ensuring compatibility with the latest environments and dependencies.
Build:
CI:
Summary by CodeRabbit
SelectDirectoryDialogclass to improve file selection handling.