Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redirect from not-found pages #22

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 9, 2024
Merged

Redirect from not-found pages #22

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

5ouma
Copy link
Owner

@5ouma 5ouma commented Nov 9, 2024

⚠️ Issue

close #


✏️ Description

Access to the non-exist page will be prohibited.


🔄 Type of the Change

  • 🎉 New Feature
  • 🧰 Bug
  • 🛡️ Security
  • 📖 Documentation
  • 🏎️ Performance
  • 🧹 Refactoring
  • 🧪 Testing
  • 🔧 Maintenance
  • 🎽 CI
  • 🧠 Meta

Access to the non-exist page will be prohibited.
@prlabeler prlabeler bot added the 🎉 New Feature Introduce a new feature label Nov 9, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the modification of the src/pages/404.astro file to implement a redirect functionality. A new line has been added to redirect users to the root path ("/") when a 404 error occurs. This update enhances error handling by guiding users back to the main page of the application when they encounter a non-existent page.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/pages/404.astro Added redirect functionality to redirect to "/" on 404 errors.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 992d61a and 0fe7318.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/404.astro (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pages/404.astro (1)

2-2: Verify the impact on SEO and analytics.

The current implementation might affect:

  1. Search engine crawlers' ability to detect 404s
  2. Analytics tracking of missing pages
  3. User behavior tracking

Let's check if there are any analytics or SEO configurations that need to be updated:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (992d61a) to head (0fe7318).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #22   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           11        11           
  Lines          154       154           
  Branches        16        16           
=========================================
  Hits           154       154           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2024

🔦 Lighthouse Result

performance accessibility best-practices seo
🟧 79 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟧 63
📊 Score Scale
Fail Average Pass
🔺 0-49 🟧 50-89 🟢 90-100

@5ouma
Copy link
Owner Author

5ouma commented Nov 9, 2024

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/404.astro (1)

2-2: Consider adding error tracking.

The current implementation silently redirects without logging the 404 occurrence. This makes it difficult to:

  1. Monitor broken links
  2. Track potential security probes
  3. Identify user navigation issues

Consider implementing error monitoring using a service like Sentry, or at minimum, adding server-side logging for 404 occurrences.

🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
src/pages/404.astro (2)

1-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider enhancing the 404 error handling implementation.

While redirecting to the homepage is a valid approach, the current implementation might not provide the best user experience. Consider these improvements:

  1. Show a user-friendly 404 page before redirecting
  2. Add error logging/tracking
  3. Maintain proper HTTP status codes

Here's a suggested implementation:

---
- return Astro.redirect("/");
+ // Log the 404 error
+ console.error(`404 Error: ${Astro.request.url}`);
+ 
+ // Set status code and redirect after a brief delay
+ Astro.response.status = 404;
+ return new Response(
+   `<html>
+     <head>
+       <title>Page Not Found</title>
+       <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="5;url=/" />
+     </head>
+     <body>
+       <h1>Page Not Found</h1>
+       <p>The page you're looking for doesn't exist. You'll be redirected to the homepage in 5 seconds.</p>
+       <p><a href="/">Click here</a> if you're not redirected automatically.</p>
+     </body>
+   </html>`,
+   {
+     headers: { "Content-Type": "text/html" },
+   }
+ );
---

This implementation:

  • Maintains the 404 status code
  • Logs the error for monitoring
  • Shows a friendly message to users
  • Provides both automatic and manual navigation options
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

---
// Log the 404 error
console.error(`404 Error: ${Astro.request.url}`);

// Set status code and redirect after a brief delay
Astro.response.status = 404;
return new Response(
  `<html>
    <head>
      <title>Page Not Found</title>
      <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="5;url=/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <h1>Page Not Found</h1>
      <p>The page you're looking for doesn't exist. You'll be redirected to the homepage in 5 seconds.</p>
      <p><a href="/">Click here</a> if you're not redirected automatically.</p>
    </body>
  </html>`,
  {
    headers: { "Content-Type": "text/html" },
  }
);
---

1-3: 💡 Codebase verification

Immediate redirect on 404 page needs modification for better SEO practices

The codebase shows proper SEO setup with comprehensive meta tags in Layout.astro, but the immediate redirect on the 404 page bypasses this setup. Consider:

  1. Creating a proper 404 page that:
    • Returns the correct 404 HTTP status code
    • Uses the Layout component with appropriate meta tags
    • Includes a delayed redirect (if desired) using client-side JavaScript
  2. This allows:
    • Search engines to properly identify broken links
    • Maintains SEO best practices
    • Still provides good UX with eventual redirection
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the impact on SEO and analytics.

The immediate redirect might affect:

  1. Search engine crawlers' ability to detect 404s
  2. Analytics tracking of missing pages
  3. Identification of broken links

Let's check if there are any analytics or SEO configurations in the project:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for analytics and SEO-related configurations
echo "Checking for analytics and SEO configurations..."
rg -l "analytics|googleAnalytics|gtag|plausible|umami|seo|sitemap" --type astro

Length of output: 218


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for analytics and SEO configurations
echo "Checking for analytics and SEO configurations in all files..."
rg -l "analytics|googleAnalytics|gtag|plausible|umami|seo|sitemap|meta|robots\.txt"

# Also check for any configuration files
echo -e "\nChecking for common configuration files..."
fd -e config.js -e config.ts -e config.mjs -e astro.config.mjs -e astro.config.ts

# Check for meta tags in any HTML/Astro files
echo -e "\nChecking for meta tags in HTML/Astro files..."
fd -e html -e astro --exec grep -l "meta|head"

Length of output: 696


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of relevant files to understand SEO setup
echo "Checking Layout.astro for meta tags setup..."
cat src/layouts/Layout.astro

echo -e "\nChecking meta.ts implementation..."
cat src/libs/meta.ts

echo -e "\nChecking astro config for any SEO plugins..."
cat astro.config.ts

Length of output: 2063

@5ouma
Copy link
Owner Author

5ouma commented Nov 9, 2024

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
src/pages/404.astro (1)

1-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider enhancing the 404 handling for better UX and SEO.

While redirecting to the homepage works, it might not provide the best user experience. Consider these improvements:

  1. Show a user-friendly 404 page before redirecting
  2. Set an appropriate HTTP status code
  3. Add error tracking

Here's a suggested implementation:

---
- return Astro.redirect("/");
+ // Maintain proper 404 status for SEO
+ Astro.response.status = 404;
+ 
+ // Optional: Add error tracking
+ console.error(`404 Error: ${Astro.request.url}`);
+ 
+ // Wait briefly to show the error page before redirecting
+ setTimeout(() => {
+   return Astro.redirect("/");
+ }, 5000);
---

<!-- Add a user-friendly template below -->
<html>
  <head>
    <title>Page Not Found</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Page Not Found</h1>
    <p>The page you're looking for doesn't exist. Redirecting to homepage...</p>
  </body>
</html>

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@5ouma 5ouma merged commit 69ba9bf into main Nov 9, 2024
12 checks passed
@5ouma 5ouma deleted the feat-page-notfound branch November 9, 2024 10:58
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🎉 New Feature Introduce a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant