Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge all Astro config object into one #59

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

Merge all Astro config object into one #59

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

5ouma
Copy link
Owner

@5ouma 5ouma commented Nov 22, 2024

⚠️ Issue

close #


✏️ Description

  • Export the entire config.
  • Enable Dev Tool not on a test

🔄 Type of the Change

  • 🎉 New Feature
  • 🧰 Bug
  • 🛡️ Security
  • 📖 Documentation
  • 🏎️ Performance
  • 🧹 Refactoring
  • 🧪 Testing
  • 🔧 Maintenance
  • 🎽 CI
  • 🧠 Meta

If `NODE_ENV` is test, disable it in succession.
@5ouma 5ouma requested a review from Copilot November 22, 2024 11:28

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (70d85d4) to head (e8caa16).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #59   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           13        13           
  Lines          172       172           
  Branches        17        17           
=========================================
  Hits           172       172           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@prlabeler prlabeler bot added the 🧹 Refactoring A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature label Nov 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

🔦 Lighthouse Result

performance accessibility best-practices seo
🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟧 63
📊 Score Scale
Fail Average Pass
🔺 0-49 🟧 50-89 🟢 90-100

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the astro.config.ts file by restructuring the integration definitions and enhancing the devToolbar configuration. The integrations are now defined inline within the defineConfig call, simplifying the previous setup that used a separate variable and conditional logic. Additionally, the devToolbar is dynamically enabled based on the NODE_ENV environment variable, improving its configurability.

Changes

File Change Summary
astro.config.ts - Integrations are now defined inline within defineConfig.
- devToolbar configuration updated to enable based on NODE_ENV instead of being statically set to false.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🧹 Refactoring


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70d85d4 and e8caa16.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • astro.config.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
astro.config.ts (4)

12-14: LGTM! Clean integration structure

The inline definition of integrations improves code locality and readability. The order of integrations is logical, with basic integrations (sitemap, icon) defined first.


38-40: LGTM! Clean conditional integration

The use of spread operator with conditional array is a clean and idiomatic approach to handle optional integrations.


51-51: Verify environment handling for devToolbar

The dynamic enablement of devToolbar based on NODE_ENV could affect CI/CD environments. Ensure this doesn't interfere with automated processes.

Let's check for other environment-dependent configurations:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the environment configuration and test setup.


Let me check the test configuration and how the environment is handled in the test setup.


DevToolbar environment configuration is safe to use

The environment-based devToolbar configuration is appropriate and won't interfere with automated processes because:

  • It's the only NODE_ENV dependent configuration in the codebase
  • Test environment is properly handled in vitest configuration
  • The devToolbar is correctly disabled during tests, which is the desired behavior
  • No other environment-specific setup conflicts with this configuration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other NODE_ENV usage in the project
rg -g '!node_modules' "process\.env\.NODE_ENV" -A 2

Length of output: 149


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for test configuration files and environment setup
fd -e test.ts -e test.js -e spec.ts -e spec.js

# Check package.json for test scripts and configurations
cat package.json | jq '.scripts'

# Look for environment setup in configuration files
fd -e config.ts -e config.js

Length of output: 607


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check vitest configuration
cat vitest.config.ts

# Check if there are any environment setup files
fd -e env -e env.ts -e env.js

# Look for test environment setup in test files
rg -g '*.test.ts' "beforeAll|beforeEach|process\.env" -A 2

Length of output: 596


15-37: ⚠️ Potential issue

Review PWA configuration for potential issues

  1. The urlPattern: () => true in runtimeCaching will catch ALL requests, not just icons. This could lead to unexpected caching behavior.
  2. Several important PWA manifest fields are missing (start_url, background_color, etc.)

Let's check if these manifest fields are required by running lighthouse:

Consider these improvements:

 manifest: {
   name: meta.name,
   short_name: meta.name,
   description: meta.description,
   icons: [{ src: meta.icon }],
   orientation: "landscape",
   display: "fullscreen",
   theme_color: "#f4f4f4",
+  start_url: "/",
+  background_color: "#ffffff",
 },

And fix the caching strategy:

 runtimeCaching: [
   {
     handler: "NetworkFirst",
     options: { cacheName: "icon" },
-    urlPattern: () => true,
+    urlPattern: /\.(svg|png|jpg|jpeg|gif|webp)$/i,
   },
 ],

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@5ouma 5ouma merged commit d06d6df into main Nov 22, 2024
12 checks passed
@5ouma 5ouma deleted the style-astro branch November 22, 2024 11:35
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧹 Refactoring A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant