Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to latest gqlparser for new ast.Path type #1022

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 16, 2020
Merged

Conversation

vvakame
Copy link
Collaborator

@vvakame vvakame commented Feb 9, 2020

apply vektah/gqlparser#117

I have:

  • Added tests covering the bug / feature (see testing)
  • Updated any relevant documentation (see docs)

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 9, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 65.394% when pulling cf6f768 on feat-gqlparser-117 into 4ece385 on master.

go.sum Outdated
@@ -59,8 +63,16 @@ github.com/urfave/cli v1.20.0 h1:fDqGv3UG/4jbVl/QkFwEdddtEDjh/5Ov6X+0B/3bPaw=
github.com/urfave/cli v1.20.0/go.mod h1:70zkFmudgCuE/ngEzBv17Jvp/497gISqfk5gWijbERA=
github.com/vektah/dataloaden v0.2.1-0.20190515034641-a19b9a6e7c9e h1:+w0Zm/9gaWpEAyDlU1eKOuk5twTjAjuevXqcJJw8hrg=
github.com/vektah/dataloaden v0.2.1-0.20190515034641-a19b9a6e7c9e/go.mod h1:/HUdMve7rvxZma+2ZELQeNh88+003LL7Pf/CZ089j8U=
github.com/vektah/gqlparser v1.2.2-0.20200207070222-bc3e68891810 h1:rWT63vqVwBxR3HWs/Uv3BaNNOjIOOKgNQ+eWk+q+pKo=
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

needs a go mod tidy

@vektah vektah marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2020 23:29
@vektah vektah merged commit 14dccc5 into master Feb 16, 2020
@vektah vektah deleted the feat-gqlparser-117 branch February 16, 2020 23:41
@vektah vektah changed the title example about apply https://github.com/vektah/gqlparser/pull/117 Update to latest gqlparser for new ast.Path type Feb 16, 2020
cgxxv pushed a commit to cgxxv/gqlgen that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants