Update metadata locations for existing CMIP5 and CMIP6 experiments

[marc-white]

Closes #200 .

New metadata.yaml have been placed in /g/data/xp65/admin/intake/metadata/, and referenced in the catalog config YAMLs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.95%. Comparing base (e67d2ba) to head (97694fc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #205   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.95%   96.95%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         623      623           
=======================================
  Hits          604      604           
  Misses         19       19           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rbeucher]

What about we copy that metadata folder to the repo?

[marc-white]

What about we copy that metadata folder to the repo?

Which metadata folder is that? If you're talking about what's now in /g/data/xp65/admin/intake/metadata, I'd be against that - we'd then have a mish-mash of some experiment metadata.yaml being in the data store, and some being in the access-nri-intake-catalog. As a general proposition, the metadata should live with the data.

That being said, given the config YAMLs that define the catalog sources are kept in the repository as an 'archive' (the build_all script needs to be pointed to a checked-out copy of the repo to access them), there is an argument to be made that storing a copy of the experiment metadata.yamls archivally in the repository makes sense. Copies would still need to live in the data store, or in /g/data/xp65/admin/intake/metadata, for use during catalog build.

[rbeucher]

I agree that the metadata.yml files should be stored alongside the data. However, when adding the NCI data collections to the datastore, we don't have write access to those projects. As there will be additional collections (see other data requests I’ve submitted), I propose keeping a copy of the metadata.yml files in the repository for reference.

[marc-white]

I agree that the metadata.yml files should be stored alongside the data. However, when adding the NCI data collections to the datastore, we don't have write access to those projects. As there will be additional collections (see other data requests I’ve submitted), I propose keeping a copy of the metadata.yml files in the repository for reference.

I've added reference copies of the YAMLs to the repository.

[rbeucher]

Great. Feel free to merge