-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delay considering a channel closed when seeing an on-chain spend #2437
Comments
t-bast
changed the title
Deloy considering a channel closed when seeing an on-chain spend
Delay considering a channel closed when seeing an on-chain spend
Sep 27, 2022
remyers
added a commit
to remyers/eclair
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2024
remyers
added a commit
to remyers/eclair
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2024
remyers
added a commit
to remyers/eclair
that referenced
this issue
Nov 4, 2024
Issue ACINQ#2437 When external channel is spent, add it to the spentChannels list instead of immediately removing it from the graph. Remove spent channels after 12 blocks. When a newly added channel is validated, if it spends the shared output of a recently spent channel then it is a splice. A splice updates the graph edges to preserve balance estimate information in the graph.
remyers
added a commit
to remyers/eclair
that referenced
this issue
Nov 5, 2024
Issue ACINQ#2437 When external channel is spent, add it to the spentChannels list instead of immediately removing it from the graph. Remove spent channels after 12 blocks. When a newly added channel is validated, if it spends the shared output of a recently spent channel then it is a splice. A splice updates the graph edges to preserve balance estimate information in the graph. Channels are immediately removed from the db so they will not added to the graph if a restart occurs before 12-blocks elapse.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See lightning/bolts#1004
This is something we should do whenever possible, as it will be necessary for splicing to have most of the network delay when they consider a channel closed (to allow a new
channel_update
to come in to notify that the channel was actually just spliced, not closed).This isn't trivial to do, because we don't have any way of tracking that state yet. We may need to add a new list in
Router.Data
to track channels that have been spent on chain and are waiting to be either removed or for which we will receive achannel_update
with a new funding outpoint (when it was a splice, not a close).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: