Anchor output: handle unilateral close #1501
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR wraps up experimental support for anchor outputs by correctly handling all unilateral close scenarios.
Anchor outputs can now be activated and should work end-to-end (but we lack support for actually using the anchors and sighash changes to bump the fees - coming next).
It has been tested end-to-end against lnd master:
I had to change the
static_remotekey
behavior, @sstone let me know if that sounds good.We used a
bitcoind
wallet address which made sense forstatic_remotekey
without anchors, because our main output in the remote commitment was directly a p2wpkh to that address.But with anchor outputs, our main output in the remote commitment is a p2wsh with a CSV-1 delay (
OP_PUSHDATA(paymentPubkey) :: OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY :: OP_1 :: OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY :: Nil
) so it doesn't make sense to use a key owned by thebitcoind
wallet, we want to be able to claim it from our internal wallet in cases of unilateral close.