-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for cgenff 4.0 halogen groups (building and simulation) #853
Comments
You mean as in |
I was asking only for building and running simulations, not about the parametrize tool. |
I'm sorry I don't have any experience with that then. You will have to give it a try :) |
Anyway, I found in CHARMM documentation on PSF lone pair syntax and how lone pairs should behave: Psfgen seems to at least add the lone pair dummy atoms but does not seem to locate them correctly and gives the error |
Here is the paper for CGENFF lone pair addition: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053860/ |
NAMD gives support for them in its last version: |
I used the psfgen that is shipped with vmd 1.9.3. |
Same result with charmm.build |
Only colinear seem to be needed at the moment. |
Maybe we just need to use the latest psfgen in htmd.
…On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 23:21, Ismael Rodriguez Espigares < ***@***.***> wrote:
LONEPAIR COLI
Only colinear seem to be needed at the moment.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#853 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHaqOvpKgkCJBbjoEV4NqE6WqS8JJXvSks5vPHj3gaJpZM4bDNvH>
.
--
<http://www.acellera.com>
<https://twitter.com/acellera>
<https://www.youtube.com/user/acelleracom>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/2133167?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2133167%2Cidx%3A2-1-2%2CtarId%3A1448018583204%2Ctas%3Aacellera>
<https://www.acellera.com/md-simulation-blog-news/>
<http://is.gd/1eXkbS>
|
After building a system with CHARMM software and testing it in NAMD, I reach the conclusion that psfgen does not support lone pairs at all as a new field has to be added at the end of the PSF file (Drude format). Otherwise, NAMD does nothing with the lone pair dummy atoms. |
I tested NAMD and ACEMD with my system built with CHARMM software. It seems working in NAMD, but not in ACEMD. In ACEMD, I cannot get passed equilibration (it seems that the barostat does not like zero-mass dummy atoms), but I've got the coordinates after minimization and it seems that ACEMD is ignoring the lone pair defined in the PSF as you can see in the two following images (links bellow): Here you have a link to my testing system and scripts: The testing system only contains clozapine parametrized with paramchem 2.2.0 and cgenff4.0 solvated in TIP3 water and NaCl. |
So, to sum up, neither psfgen, htmd nor acemd seem to support cgenff4.0 lone pairs right now. Hence, CHARMM FF versions after February 2016 (not included) cannot be used as they are with paramchem parameters for ligands with halogen groups (and I do not know if any modifications are needed to make them backwards compatible with cgenff3.0.1) with these 3 software packages for the moment. Any plans for ACEMD compatibility with cgenff4.0 and halogen groups? |
Last releases of CHARMM force-field now work with CGenFF 4.0. These provide lone pairs for halogen atoms and paramchem 2.0 already provides support for producing analogy based parameters for CGenFF 4.0.
Are there any plans on supporting long pairs in ACEMD and/or HTMD?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: