Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge with master #8

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

AhmedAbdoOrtiga
Copy link
Owner

Description of changes

Pull request checklist

  • Addresses an existing issue: #0000
  • Ran yarn fastpass
  • Added/updated relevant unit test(s) (and ran yarn test)
  • Verified code coverage for the changes made. Check coverage report at: <rootDir>/test-results/unit/coverage
  • PR title AND final merge commit title both start with a semantic tag (fix:, chore:, feat(feature-name):, refactor:). See CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • (UI changes only) Added screenshots/GIFs to description above
  • (UI changes only) Verified usability with NVDA/JAWS

waabid and others added 5 commits April 13, 2020 14:42
…ssessment guidance (#2480)

#### Description of changes

Remove the `WCAG 1.3.1` link from headings guidance.

<!--
  A great PR description includes:
    * A high level overview (usually a sentence or two) describing what the PR changes
    * What is the motivation for the change? This can be as simple as "addresses issue #123"
    * Were there any alternative approaches you considered? What tradeoffs did you consider?
    * What **doesn't** the change try to do? Are there any parts that you've intentionally left out-of-scope for a later PR to handle? What are the issues/work items tracking that later work?
    * Is there any other context that reviewers should consider? For example, other related issues/PRs, or any particularly tricky/subtle bits of implementation that need closer-than-normal review?
-->

#### Pull request checklist
<!-- If a checklist item is not applicable to this change, write "n/a" in the checkbox -->
- [x] Addresses an existing issue: #2444 
- [x] Ran `yarn fastpass`
- [x] Added/updated relevant unit test(s) (and ran `yarn test`)
- [x] Verified code coverage for the changes made. Check coverage report at: `<rootDir>/test-results/unit/coverage`
- [x] PR title *AND* final merge commit title both start with a semantic tag (`fix:`, `chore:`, `feat(feature-name):`, `refactor:`). See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
- [x] (UI changes only) Added screenshots/GIFs to description above
- [ ] (UI changes only) Verified usability with NVDA/JAWS


#### Screenshot

<img width="567" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-12 at 3 17 05 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4496335/79081322-3789ac80-7cd1-11ea-9774-25888a65161a.png">
#### Description of changes
These changes add the option to export reports to CodePen in addition to an HTML file. There is a [relevant open issue](#1739) detailing a need for this type of functionality. 

I wasn't quite sure what the design should look like for this so I've went ahead and used a split `PrimaryButton` from `office-ui-fabric-react` in the `ExportDialog ` component but I'm definitely open to alternative approaches!


![a11y-report-export](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8262156/75588928-d8c8e600-5a36-11ea-930e-155c459a8bae.gif)


I was also considering splitting out the HTML and CSS before sending the payload to CodePen but I figured I'd get some feedback on the changes within this PR before moving forward with more in-depth functionality.

<!--
  A great PR description includes:
    * A high level overview (usually a sentence or two) describing what the PR changes
    * What is the motivation for the change? This can be as simple as "addresses issue #123"
    * Were there any alternative approaches you considered? What tradeoffs did you consider?
    * What **doesn't** the change try to do? Are there any parts that you've intentionally left out-of-scope for a later PR to handle? What are the issues/work items tracking that later work?
    * Is there any other context that reviewers should consider? For example, other related issues/PRs, or any particularly tricky/subtle bits of implementation that need closer-than-normal review?
-->

#### Pull request checklist
<!-- If a checklist item is not applicable to this change, write "n/a" in the checkbox -->
- [x] Addresses an existing issue: #1739
- [x] Ran `yarn fastpass`
- [x] Added/updated relevant unit test(s) (and ran `yarn test`)
- [x] Verified code coverage for the changes made. Check coverage report at: `<rootDir>/test-results/unit/coverage`
- [x] PR title *AND* final merge commit title both start with a semantic tag (`fix:`, `chore:`, `feat(feature-name):`, `refactor:`). Check workflow guide at: `<rootDir>/docs/workflow.md`
- [x] (UI changes only) Added screenshots/GIFs to description above
- [x] (UI changes only) Verified usability with NVDA/JAWS
@AhmedAbdoOrtiga AhmedAbdoOrtiga merged commit a09f9a4 into AhmedAbdoOrtiga:master Apr 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants