Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

文件复制产生重复 #6251

Closed
4 tasks done
cryingcheems opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6409
Closed
4 tasks done

文件复制产生重复 #6251

cryingcheems opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6409
Labels
bug Something isn't working dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Comments

@cryingcheems
Copy link

Please make sure of the following things

  • I have read the documentation.
    我已经阅读了文档

  • I'm sure there are no duplicate issues or discussions.
    我确定没有重复的issue或讨论。

  • I'm sure it's due to AList and not something else(such as Network ,Dependencies or Operational).
    我确定是AList的问题,而不是其他原因(例如网络依赖操作)。

  • I'm sure this issue is not fixed in the latest version.
    我确定这个问题在最新版本中没有被修复。

AList Version / AList 版本

v3.32.0

Driver used / 使用的存储驱动

谷歌—>115

Describe the bug / 问题描述

从谷歌复制到115,文件会产生重复,文件名后会多加一个后缀
image

Reproduction / 复现链接

Config / 配置

Logs / 日志

No response

@cryingcheems cryingcheems added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 21, 2024
@xhofe xhofe added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Mar 25, 2024
@anyingxiuluo
Copy link

我也频繁遇到这个问题,希望能解决

@pongfcnkl
Copy link

把覆盖打开好像就不会有重复的文件了,
NoOverwriteUpload改成false
https://github.com/alist-org/alist/blob/0c9dcec9cdcb0416e630116adee090b4640635e8/drivers/115/meta.go#L22

SheltonZhu added a commit to SheltonZhu/alist that referenced this issue Apr 30, 2024
xhofe pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants