Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the ReactiveResilienceStrategy type-safe #1462

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 8, 2023

Conversation

martintmk
Copy link
Contributor

@martintmk martintmk commented Aug 8, 2023

Details on the issue fix or feature implementation

One reoccurring complaint about the current non-generic core was the possibility of combining incompatible reactive strategies. This PR improves the API and makes the above not possible.

This was ensured with the following changes:

  • ReactiveResilienceStrategy<T> no longer derives from ResilienceStrategy.
  • Added two new AddStrategy extensions for both CompositeStrategyBuilder and CompositeStrategyBuilder<T> that require factory returning ReactiveResilienceStrategy<T>.
  • Reimplemented all extensions for reactive strategies to use the new API

Going forward the author of custom resilience strategies can use:

  • ResilienceStrategy as a base class for non-reactive strategies
  • ReactiveResilienceStrategy<T> as a base class for reactive strategies

Contributes to #1454

Confirm the following

  • I started this PR by branching from the head of the default branch
  • I have targeted the PR to merge into the default branch
  • I have included unit tests for the issue/feature
  • I have successfully run a local build

@martintmk martintmk added the v8 Issues related to the new version 8 of the Polly library. label Aug 8, 2023
@martintmk martintmk added this to the v8.0.0 milestone Aug 8, 2023
@martintmk
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc: @vany0114

In your PR you have MonkeyStrategy<T> that derives from MonkeyStrategy. With this new API that won't be possible anymore. I was thinking of making ReactiveResilienceStrategy<T> an interface but it didn't feel right.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1462 (cabfd57) into main (b1ec863) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1462      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.92%   83.89%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         274      276       +2     
  Lines        6506     6495      -11     
  Branches     1012     1015       +3     
==========================================
- Hits         5460     5449      -11     
  Misses        837      837              
  Partials      209      209              
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 83.89% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
...CircuitBreaker/CircuitBreakerResilienceStrategy.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../Polly.Core/Fallback/FallbackResilienceStrategy.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...rc/Polly.Core/Hedging/HedgingResilienceStrategy.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Polly.Core/Retry/RetryResilienceStrategy.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ircuitBreakerCompositeStrategyBuilderExtensions.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/Polly.Core/CompositeStrategyBuilderExtensions.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...back/FallbackCompositeStrategyBuilderExtensions.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...dging/HedgingCompositeStrategyBuilderExtensions.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Polly.Core/ReactiveResilienceStrategy.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Polly.Core/ResilienceStrategy.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

@martintmk martintmk merged commit 4153d2a into main Aug 8, 2023
@martintmk martintmk deleted the mtomka/make-reactivestrategies-typesafe branch August 8, 2023 09:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
v8 Issues related to the new version 8 of the Polly library.
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants