Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added async serialization methods #404

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 23, 2023

Conversation

tjoubert
Copy link
Contributor

Solves issue #281

@tjoubert tjoubert requested review from DiscoPYF and rossmills99 July 30, 2022 16:46
@tjoubert tjoubert added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 2, 2022
@DiscoPYF DiscoPYF linked an issue Aug 2, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@tjoubert tjoubert requested a review from mpoeter October 26, 2022 05:05
Copy link
Collaborator

@DiscoPYF DiscoPYF left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any thoughts about this comment? #281 (comment)

@tjoubert tjoubert changed the title Added async serialization methods Breaking Change: Added async serialization methods Nov 29, 2022
@tjoubert tjoubert removed the request for review from rossmills99 November 29, 2022 08:39
@tjoubert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any thoughts about this comment? #281 (comment)

I've made this change.

@tjoubert tjoubert added the breaking change Identify issues that contain a breaking change for existing consumer code label Nov 29, 2022
@tjoubert tjoubert changed the title Breaking Change: Added async serialization methods Added async serialization methods Nov 29, 2022
@tjoubert tjoubert requested a review from DiscoPYF November 29, 2022 11:38
@tjoubert
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjoubert commented Dec 5, 2022

@DiscoPYF , I've made all the relevant changes. Will merge once you approve.

@tjoubert tjoubert requested a review from DiscoPYF December 5, 2022 10:52
Copy link
Collaborator

@DiscoPYF DiscoPYF left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left a comment to consider before merging. But looks good otherwise.

As it is a breaking change in theory, we should hold off merging until after the next minor release? In practice, it may not affect many consumers, but we don't know who is using a customer serializer implementation.

arangodb-net-standard/AdminApi/AdminApiClient.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tjoubert tjoubert merged commit fe1e42d into master Jan 23, 2023
@tjoubert tjoubert deleted the feature-3.8/DE-25-add-async-serialization-methods branch January 23, 2023 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change Identify issues that contain a breaking change for existing consumer code enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use Task<T> as return type in IApiClientSerialization
3 participants