Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't use pxe / node / p2p-bootstrap docker images #3394

Closed
spypsy opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3396
Closed

Don't use pxe / node / p2p-bootstrap docker images #3394

spypsy opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3396

Comments

@spypsy
Copy link
Member

spypsy commented Nov 22, 2023

Now that the sandbox image has the ability to run as a pxe / node / p2p bootstrap node, we don't need separate images for these.

@spypsy spypsy added this to A3 Nov 22, 2023
@spypsy spypsy converted this from a draft issue Nov 22, 2023
@spypsy spypsy changed the title Don't use pxe / node docker images Don't use pxe / node / p2p-bootstrap docker images Nov 22, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in A3 Nov 22, 2023
PhilWindle pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2023
Closes #3394 

# Checklist:
Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if
the PR is ready to merge.
- [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g.
cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag.
- [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed
unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code.
- [ ] Every change is related to the PR description.
- [ ] I have
[linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue)
this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant