Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unused ClusterManager API structs #4011

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hawkowl
Copy link
Collaborator

@hawkowl hawkowl commented Dec 13, 2024

Which issue this PR addresses:

Fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ARO-9171

What this PR does / why we need it:

Removes the invalid ClusterManager API structs + generation code + regenerates the clients.

Test plan for issue:

Unit test/E2E.

Is there any documentation that needs to be updated for this PR?

N/A?

How do you know this will function as expected in production?

Should need to pass ARM review.

@hawkowl hawkowl added priority-high High priority issue or pull request size-medium Size medium next-up ready-for-review go Pull requests that update Go code skippy pull requests raised by member of Team Skippy labels Dec 13, 2024
@hawkowl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hawkowl commented Dec 13, 2024

/azp run ci

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks! We're partially duplicating this change in https://github.com/Azure/ARO-RP/pull/4014/files for the purposes of getting it reviewed by ARM (and probably breaking changes team too), so I'll put a hold here. The only question I have is why we're removing the resource types from all API versions instead of just subsequent ones. I am not sure that the ARM team would be OK with such a change.

@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese added the hold Hold label Dec 16, 2024
@hawkowl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hawkowl commented Dec 20, 2024

@cadenmarchese Since they were never wired up and we're implementing things differently, plus they don't conform with the ARM guidelines, it's easier to remove them. We could perhaps just not upload previous APIs if it's too much of an issue, but we don't want to keep all of the generation code around just for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go Pull requests that update Go code hold Hold next-up priority-high High priority issue or pull request ready-for-review size-medium Size medium skippy pull requests raised by member of Team Skippy
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants