Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert #2662: Refactors to add preview hooks back to encryption APIs #2826

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 29, 2021

Conversation

j82w
Copy link
Contributor

@j82w j82w commented Oct 27, 2021

Pull Request Template

Description

The encryption SDK is still in preview and is blocked on other libraries being made GA. Moving these APIs back to the preview SDK. This gives the ability to make a breaking change to the core SDK APIs being exposed for encryption if the encryption SDK requires it. This might be possible because one of the encryption SDK dependencies has breaking changes.

Reverts commit: ab27fb1

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • [] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • [] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • [] This change requires a documentation update

Closing issues

To automatically close an issue: closes #IssueNumber

@j82w j82w changed the title Revert #2662: Refactors to add preview hooks to encryption APIs Revert #2662: Refactors to add preview hooks back to encryption APIs Oct 27, 2021
@kirankumarkolli kirankumarkolli merged commit b73ed61 into master Oct 29, 2021
@kirankumarkolli kirankumarkolli deleted the users/jawilley/encryption/preview branch October 29, 2021 23:56
sourabh1007 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2021
anujtoshniwal added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants