[in-proc backport] Fallback behavior to ensure in-proc payload compatibility with dotnet-isolated as the FUNCTIONS_WORKER_RUNTIME value #10439 #10449
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t-isolated` as the `FUNCTIONS_WORKER_RUNTIME` value (#10439) * Adding diagnostic warning/error when function worker runtime does not match with deployed payload * Making the new condition specific to "dotnet-isolated" worker to reduce impact. * Adding a test * PR feedback fixes * Missed release notes in last push * Removed an unnecessary code change. * Minor cleanup * Minor cleanup- made a method private and vairable renaming * Updating HostingConfig test to reflect the new hosting config property addition. * PR Feedback updates. * Fix test to reflect renaming changes from PR feedback.
satvu
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
cjaliaga
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in-proc backport of #10439