Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ReleasePR sql/resource-manager] Add connectionPolicy spec back to V5 SDK #1605

Conversation

openapi-sdkautomation[bot]
Copy link

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Apr 22, 2021

@ghost ghost added the automerge label Apr 22, 2021
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR has been auto-approved by the @msftbot for the azure-resource-manager-schemas repo.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 22, 2021

Hello @msftbot[bot]!

Because this pull request has the automerge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

Do note that I've been instructed to only help merge pull requests of this repository that have been opened for at least 1 minute. No worries though, I will be back when the time is right! 😉

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

add connectionPolicy spec back to V5 SDK (#14088)
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot changed the title [ReleasePR sql/resource-manager] Use 2014-04-01 replication link specs in V5 SDK [ReleasePR sql/resource-manager] Add connectionPolicy spec back to V5 SDK Apr 23, 2021
@ghost ghost removed the automerge label Apr 23, 2021
@azcloudfarmer
Copy link
Collaborator

@leni-msft you can reopen once merge conflicts resolved

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant