Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Quantum to add version preview/2019-11-04-preview #11266

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Jan 18, 2021

Conversation

anpaz
Copy link
Contributor

@anpaz anpaz commented Oct 19, 2020

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service
  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 19, 2020

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️⚠️LintDiff: 2 Warnings warning [Detail]

Rule Message
⚠️ R4006 - DeprecatedXmsCodeGenerationSetting The x-ms-code-generation-setting extension is being deprecated. Please remove it and move settings to readme file for code generation.
New: Microsoft.Quantum/preview/2019-11-04-preview/quantum.json#L6
⚠️ R4024 - PreviewVersionOverOneYear The API version:2019-11-04-preview having been in a preview state over one year , please move it to GA or retire.
New: Microsoft.Quantum/preview/2019-11-04-preview/quantum.json#L5
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

azure-sdk-for-python

⚠️ warning [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ⚠️ Generate from 35c2de7 with merge commit 63faa2fb44246756d1d1c27fa21e4c4fdb83c5b1. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20200918.2
    Failed to find any changed packages. Please check the changed file list.
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/__init__.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/_configuration.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/_quantum_management_client.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/models/__init__.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/models/_models.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/models/_models_py3.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/models/_paged_models.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/models/_quantum_management_client_enums.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/operations/__init__.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/operations/_offerings_operations.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/operations/_workspaces_operations.py
    /z/work/azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/azure-mgmt/quantum/version.py

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

azure-sdk-for-js

⚠️ warning [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ⚠️ Generate from 35c2de7 with merge commit 63faa2fb44246756d1d1c27fa21e4c4fdb83c5b1. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20200918.2
    Failed to find any diff after autorest so no changed packages was found.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

azure-sdk-for-go

️✔️ succeeded [Logs] [Expand Details]

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

azure-sdk-for-net

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

azure-resource-manager-schemas

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

azure-sdk-for-java

⚠️ warning [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ⚠️ Generate from 35c2de7 with merge commit 63faa2fb44246756d1d1c27fa21e4c4fdb83c5b1. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20200918.2
    Failed to find any diff after autorest so no changed packages was found.

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

Trenton Generation

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Oct 19, 2020

Azure CLI Extension Generation

No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @anpaz Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Oct 19, 2020
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @anpaz your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). cc @${PRAssignee}

    @chiragg4u
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Please remove the draft flag if you would like to get the review started.

    @chiragg4u
    Copy link
    Contributor

    While adding new version the recommendation is to copy the existing version into new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes for easy review. Please create new branch with this recommendation for faster review.
    In case this is a new RP please schedule meeting with ARM API review board, if the review meeting was done please share the review notes with the ARM api review board for reviewing.

    "type": "object",
    "description": "The resource proxy definition object for quantum workspace.",
    "properties": {
    "id": {
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Workspace looks like a tracked resource type. It must support PATCH to patch tags at least.
    https://armwiki.azurewebsites.net/api_contracts/guidelines/rpc.html#rpc007-resource-types-must-support-patch-for-tags

    @j5lim j5lim added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Jan 12, 2021
    Copy link
    Contributor

    @j5lim j5lim left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Approving from ARM side.

    "QuantumWorkspace": {
    "type": "object",
    "description": "The resource proxy definition object for quantum workspace.",
    "properties": {
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Adding SystemData (a new top level property for system metadata) is recommended. But it is not a blocker.

    https://armwiki.azurewebsites.net/rpaas/systemdata.html

    @j5lim j5lim added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jan 13, 2021
    @masenol
    Copy link
    Contributor

    masenol commented Jan 13, 2021

    @njuCZ Could you help in merging this PR? Thanks in advance.

    @masenol
    Copy link
    Contributor

    masenol commented Jan 15, 2021

    /azp run unifiedPipeline

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 11266 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

    @masenol
    Copy link
    Contributor

    masenol commented Jan 15, 2021

    /azp run unifiedPipeline

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 11266 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

    @masenol
    Copy link
    Contributor

    masenol commented Jan 15, 2021

    /azp run unifiedPipeline

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 11266 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

    @njuCZ njuCZ merged commit 65e3640 into Azure:master Jan 18, 2021
    mkarmark pushed a commit to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
    …review/2019-11-04-preview (Azure#11266)
    
    * New Readme Config File
    
    * New Go Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Typescript Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Python Language Readme Config File
    
    * New C# Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Ruby Language Readme Config File
    
    * New Swagger Spec File
    
    * New Swagger Example Spec File
    
    * New Swagger for Azure Quantum RP
    
    * Adding MSI fields
    
    * Incorporating ARM feedback (Azure#1)
    
    * Picking up changes from RPSaaS.
    
    * -ruby
    
    * go
    
    * clean up readme config
    
    * -java
    
    * preview path
    
    * python version
    
    * incorporate feedback
    
    * read-only
    
    * ids
    
    * prettier
    
    * removing patch
    
    * addressing feedback
    
    * prettier fix
    
    * removing tags - coming from TrackedResource
    
    * un-referencing trackedresource
    
    * adding patch, referring to the common-type tracked resource
    
    * prettier fix
    
    * Adds suppression to readme
    
    * Adds suppression to readme
    
    Co-authored-by: Adele Bai <adbai@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Mahmut Burak Senol <masenol@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: masenol <54191670+masenol@users.noreply.github.com>
    mccleanp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
    * Incorporating feedback from ARM review
    
    * whitespace
    
    * azure-validator=true
    
    * fixing delete examples
    
    * fixing operations schema.
    
    * r4023
    
    * prettier
    
    * readmes
    
    * preview folder
    
    * -ruby
    
    * python version
    
    * incorporating feedback.
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.