-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix swagger linting issues #11886
Fix swagger linting issues #11886
Conversation
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
1023 - TypeFormatChanged |
The new version has a different format than the previous one. New: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L819:9 Old: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L819:9 |
1023 - TypeFormatChanged |
The new version has a different format than the previous one. New: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L883:9 Old: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L882:9 |
1023 - TypeFormatChanged |
The new version has a different format than the previous one. New: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L819:9 Old: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L819:9 |
1023 - TypeFormatChanged |
The new version has a different format than the previous one. New: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L883:9 Old: Microsoft.HealthcareApis/stable/2020-03-30/healthcare-apis.json#L882:9 |
️️✔️
LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi @anrudraw, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Will review this PR after removing label |
@erich-wang forgot to remove the "NotReadyForReview" label. Removed it now and PR is ready for the review. I'm not sure why this fix for s360 reporting breaking change. |
Hi @anrudraw, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
@anrudraw , you're adding |
Hi, @anrudraw. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove |
@erich-wang makes sense. I just added the format based on recommendation provided in the s360 report. Is there a process i would need to follow to get this PR approved? |
@anrudraw , you just need to follow : |
@erich-wang I think this breaking change is false positive. The format that I added for the 2 parameters, their max allowed integer value is already within int32 range. I tried accessing this link: https://aka.ma/swaggerfeedback but getting internal server error. |
@anrudraw , the correct link should be https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback, sorry for the typo. |
* Fixing swagger linting issues * Updated int type and patch call response * updated example * Removed update to patch call response * Removed response code from swagger spec
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.